The requirements of mandated reporting and your views about confidentiality.

 

 

 

 

In this Discussion, you examine the requirements of mandated reporting and your views about confidentiality.

 

Describe at least two circumstances when you are legally mandated to break client confidentiality and disclose selected privileged information without the client’s consent.
Identify a time when someone broke your confidence, and explain how it made you feel.
Describe how your experiences related to confidentiality have shaped your view on mandate reporting.
References

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0145213406000500?via%3Dihub

https://www.socialworkers.org/about/ethics/code-of-ethics

 

 

Sample Solution

In the social work profession, it is essential for practitioners to maintain client confidentiality: this involves protecting any information revealed during sessions which may be used against the client in some way (National Association of Social Workers [NASW],2017). While respecting a person’s privacy is key, there are certain circumstances where sharing privileged information without consent is legally mandated.

The first such instance is when a person poses a risk of harm to themselves or another individual (NASW 2017). In these cases social workers must disclose relevant details about the clients in order to protect them from potential danger. For example if a parent were to inform their therapist that they plan on harming their child then the practitioner would need to contact appropriate authorities as soon as possible so as prevent any serious injury.

Another situation where disclosure of confidential information may be required occurs when there are suspicions of child abuse or neglect (Cecil & Norcross 2006). In such cases the law dictates that therapists must report any concerns they have regarding mistreatment whether or not they believe it has actually occurred. This includes violations related sexual abuse, physical assault and emotional maltreatment amongst other forms in order for victims receive assistance and justice moving forward.

In conclusion then we can see how although maintaining client confidentiality is an integral part of being a successful social worker it should not take precedence over safety at all times. There exist situations wherein breaking privilege becomes necessary due issues involving self-harm and/or abuse which could potentially result in severe consequences if left unchecked. By understanding these legal requirements practitioners will be able to better protect both their own interests as well those belonging to those for whom they provide services.

 

 

The Revenger’s Tragedy

Misfortune of Avengers What sort of misfortune is this? By definition, the misfortune is “a staggering, excruciating, dismal occasion”. Notwithstanding, the awfulness of Avengers doesn’t uncover every one of these highlights. It is frightful and abnormal, loaded with wicked, brutal, dead and maniacal grisly clarifications, however this is certainly not a dismal story. Instead of cause the crowd to feel distress, they regularly draw mind blowing doubtful feelings. The reason for the misfortune isn’t inefficient sorrow, however to utilize retaliation as a persuading intends to cause contempt.

Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the retribution of the renaissance (“misfortune of vengeance”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of vengeance, Shakespeare confounds the essential retribution plot by making three vengeance plots. By including significant advancements, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is definitely not a physical legend yet a phantom, not an apparition, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint

In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s vengeance, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the dramatist ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Despite the fact that their essential topic and shows are comparable, the two plays show a differentiating picture of vengeance; rather than “Vindicator’s misfortune”, Hamlet is an increasingly complex of his hero Provide treatment restricted by the creator’s social data and lacking

The awfulness of vengeance (some of the time called retribution dramatization, vengeance show or grisly misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the deadly aftereffect of vengeance and retribution. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution show”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and frequently killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort previously showed up in the early current British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were additionally viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of renowned retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).

 

 

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.