Assignment Content
As a health care manager you are responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of new technologies.
Reflect on the weekly assignments completed throughout the course in regards to the selection, integration, and implementation of a new technology.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in in which you:
Examine strategies to evaluate the effectiveness of the new technology and system. Answer the following questions:
How can you determine if it is the right technology to use?
How can you determine if it integrates well with existing technology?
How can you determine if the system is intuitive or easy to use for the users?
How can you determine the cost and benefits of the technology and system?
Explain your role and responsibilities as a manager in the evaluation of technology in health care.
Identify data sources used to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented technology.
A Bachelor of Arts degree is very down to earth and valuable when new to the workforce. The motivation behind an expressions degree is to illuminate your comprehension of the world and how it functions. This is strengthened by the way that basic reasoning abilities are fundamental and utilized in our regular day to day existence and are instructed while finishing an expressions degree. As indicated by Tara DeLecce, basic reasoning aptitudes are characterized as “making contemplated decisions that are coherent and all around considered. It is a perspective in which you don’t just acknowledge all contentions and ends you are presented to yet rather have a demeanor including addressing such contentions and ends” DeLecce (2015) basic reasoning abilities are broken into three primary classifications interest; which the longing is to learn data and have the right proof just as being presented to new Ideas and data. The subsequent doubt; which isn’t thinking everything straight away yet having a reasonable addressing mentality lastly quietude; which is the capacity to recognize that your suppositions and Beliefs perhaps wrong when presented with persuading proof. Having these aptitudes which were gotten by finishing an expressions degree permits a person to have an open attitude as far as your work just as your encompassing universities.
Then again, many restrict basic reasoning and accept that it doesn’t have a fruitful result when utilized in regular daily existence, Carl Hendrick an educator at a King’s College London states “as opposed to showing nonexclusive basic reasoning aptitudes, we should concentrate on subject-explicit basic reasoning abilities that try to expand an understudy’s individual subject information and open the interesting” Hendrick (2012). A formative analyst Carol Dweck states in any case and uncovered that having a development or basic reasoning outlook where your results originate from exertion instead of ability prompts accomplishment for the two children and adultsDignitary’s proposition brings up her motivation of working this article to call attention to what is and isn’t viewed as workmanship.. She proceeds with her difference about the naming of craftsmanship by sponsorship up her case with a video she shows to every last bit of her classes. In the video a prehistorian is looking at a bit of workmanship made by the Mayans, he clarifies the pleasant craftsmanship and detail as a method for raising the “goodness” factor of the piece to the crowd as though they cant as of now observe the detail themselves. Errington disproves this by clarifying that “by distinguishing the cut rock as craftsmanship, he reveals to us nothing about the old Maya; he rather discloses to us how he esteems the stone corresponding to other removed things.” Basically expressing that since he clarifies the appearance of a bit of workmanship, doesn’t make it genuinely craftsmanship in Deans eyes.
The essayist’s message turns into a piece more clear when she starts to offer an answer for the issue of workmanship naming. Hayden White offers a sort of arrangement by expressing “The creator moves us to see things from an alternate perspective” which can be seen as expressing that as opposed to censuring what one may consider workmanship and what the other probably won’t call craftsmanship, for what reason don’t we simply acknowledge the imagination of craftsmanship for it essentially being there in presence as opposed to simply not having workmanship by any means. This identifies with the general public we live in today on the grounds that a ton of times we become involved with contending over basic material things, for example, cash, vehicles, garments, and so on when we basically need to acknowledge and welcome each other’s presence.