The Role of IGOs in Global Civil Society

 

IGOs are made up of member governments, and they may be global, regional, or issue focused. An IGO focusses on goals and policies aligned with its mission. In this assignment, you will examine IGOs, their formation, their functions, their differences from NGOs, and their effectiveness.
Instructions
Write a 3 page paper about the following:
1. Define IGOs and NGOs. Compare their roles in global civil society.
2. Explain why IGOs that are formed by treaties are more advantageous and effective than a grouping of sovereign nations. Provide examples.
3. IGOs also serve several basic functions that enhance cooperation. Choose two of the following IGOs and discuss their functions. Explore their role in international policymaking.
o United Nations.
o Organization of American States.
o North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
o World Health Organization.
4. Describe three examples where IGOs have become increasingly prominent. Include examples such as facilitating conflict resolution between states, handling human rights violations, and dealing with impossible dilemmas where there is no positive outcome or no solution within conflicting states.

 

 

Sample Solution

Global governance entails an ecosystem of formal and informal institutions. It is formally the domain and responsibility of sovereign nation states, and traditionally studied with a microscope on national interest and state power. Non-sovereign nations and other organizations and associations lack full international legal personality. They are in many ways marginal to central decision-making, diplomacy and negotiation in formal intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). But global governance is much bigger than formal IGOs, and indeed is increasingly composed of multi-stakeholder, complex governance institutions and informal “soft law” agreements. Even within the confines of formal IGO structures, where sovereign nation-states negotiate and decide, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) play an important role.

number of trials would delay the system and could be more expensive. The judges said the government’s £350 million budget reduction plan would eliminate legal funding for the entire legal field, including divorce, social security, debt and housing, and lead to an inevitable budget decline quality of justice in England and Wales.

Lord Neuberger the President of the Supreme Court, warned in his speech on the 5th of March 2013 that reducing legal aid in civil matters would limit access to justice. Which could make people take the laws into their own hands as they feel that they cannot access justice. Since early 1970s, many published studies have raised questions about how lawyers can actually meet the needs of the entire community if services that could solve all problems under the law are provided. However, it is also noted that lawyers are often used by limited social groups for limited services.

In 2002, a study conducted by the LSC research department showed that many people are not taking any action to resolve their legal problems due to a lack of understanding of how to do it, especially those term illness or disability, vulnerable groups who are more likely to face legal problems. The study also showed that many people did not seek legal aid from lawyers or counselling centres, but they resorted to social workers, health workers, social care services and religious organizations, even though there are only 5,000 companies providing state-funded legal services. Some fear that few areas might be financed by state legal service providers, which poses a threat to the overall justice system.

Since 2007, per capita funding for legal aid services has been decreasing. Therefore, the pressure on the Community Legal Centre (CLC) was increased due to demand for services and profit, and the increasing allocation of funds. In 2012, the federal government promised to inject funds to increase the volume of legal aid services, launch pilot exploration programs and increase advertising programs to meet new demands, while others prefer to expand existing services. However, in December 2013, the Federal government announced that it would not comply with the financing agreement after July 1, 2015. Therefore, it is expected that the implementation of the CLC would no long

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.