The Stanford Prison Experiment

 

On the basis of your research on the Stanford Prison Experiment, share your response to the following questions:

What is the Stanford Prison Experiment? Describe it.
Would you expect such an experiment to be allowed to proceed today? Why or why not?
How would you proceed, if you were to create an experiment that seeks to test the same hypothesis as for the Stanford Prison Experiment?
What changes would you make in order to protect the safety of the participants?
Were the researchers able to learn anything despite being forced to abandon the experiment early?
Do you agree that there were ethical problems with the study or are critics making too much of it? Analyze the situation and support it with rationale.

Sample Solution

In a two-week simulation of a prison setting, the Stanford prison experiment (SPE) was designed to look at the effects of situational variables on participants’ reactions and behaviors. Philip Zimbardo, a psychology professor at Stanford University, headed the research team that conducted the study in the summer of 2012. A newspaper ad offered $15 a day to male students who wished to participate in a “psychological study of prison life,” and participants were recruited from the local community. After being assessed for psychological stability, volunteers were assigned to be either prisoners or prison guards at random. The validity of these procedures has been questioned by some.

Exposure Therapy (ET) targets learned avoidant behaviours in response to situations that someone with PTSD might associate with the reason for their trauma. The aim of the therapy is to “expose” a client to what they fear or avoid in a safe way in order to decrease the fear and reduce avoidance by desensitization (Craske, Treanor, Conway, Zbozinek & Vervliet, 2014). Due to ET targeting learned behaviours, it is used regularly in conjunction with CBT (Foa, Rothbaum & Furr, 2003). A more modern take on ET is using Virtual Reality, and it is mainly used with veterans of war, as the scenes they were exposed to are easier to recreate than other forms of trauma, such as sexual assault, and is an alternative to imagination exposure (Rothbaum et al., 1999). Miyahira, Folen, Hoffman, Garcia-Palacios and Schaper (2010) conducted a case study of a Vietnam veteran that had completed 18 months in Iraq over two deployments. In this study, the soldier was treated with Virtual Reality Exposure (VRE) over 6 sessions. The participant reported that the VR headset made him feel as though he were back in Iraq and helped him to remember events of what happened more clearly. This is encouraging as the point of ET is to enable participants to re-live their trauma to be able to process it properly and therefor begin the healing process and to prevent sufferers of PTSD from developing long-term psychological damage (CITE). Difede and Hoffman (2002) also found promising results. Their case study consisted of administering VRE to survivors of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The participant’s symptoms were measured using the Beck Depression Inventory and the Clinically Administered PTSD Scale. It was seen that there was a 90% reduction of symptoms of PTSD and an 83% reduction in symptoms of depression after completion of the therapy. Another treatment that works in similar ways is Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR).

This therapy is designed to target and treat the symptoms of trauma and is especially used to treat symptoms of PTSD and is recommended by NICE as a primary treatment (NICE, 2018). It is seen as a cognitive-behavioural treatment combined with aspects of exposure therapy (Boudewyns & Hyer, 1996) and it works by the participant recalling the traumatic events that they experienced whilst simultaneously having their attention directed to a physical bilateral stimulation they are receiving, such as hearing tones in alternating ears, moving eyes rapidly from side to side, or tapping sensations of either side of the body. Similarly to ET, this therapy works by allowing the mind to safely experience traumatic events, letting the mind process them fully in order to heal appropriately (Shapiro, 1996). A systematic narrative review was carried out on the effectiveness of EMDR for PTSD from four randomized control trials and two meta-analyses. It was found that the therapy was ab

This question has been answered.

Get Answer