The support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor leading to the settlement of Alaska Native land

at
Categories
Tags

 

Question 1 Question 1: Consider the following statement:The support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor leading to the settlement of
Alaska Native land claims. Is this conclusion consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then
explain your choice in one or two sentences.
Question 2 Question 2: Consider the following statement:ANCSA was a fair settlement for Alaska Natives. Is this conclusion consistent with the
evidence presented in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then explain your choice in one or two sentences.
Question 3 Question 3: Consider the following statement: ANCSA led to economic benefits for white Alaskans as well as for Natives. Is this
conclusion consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block? Answer Yes or No, and then explain your choice in one or two
sentences.
Module Eight: Thinking About History, continued, Learning Block 8-2 (page 2): Module Eight: Thinking About History, continued, Learning Block 8-2 (page 2):
Question 4 Question 4: For an American literature course:What skills from this course would you use to develop a brief essay on the significance of
Walt Whitman’s “When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom’d,” a poem written in the summer of 1865?
Question 5 Question 5: For a sociology course:What skills from this course would you use to produce an annotated bibliography for your course
research project?
Question 6 Question 6: For a business course:What skills from this course would you use to decide between two different investment proposals?

 

Sample Solution

Question 1

Answer: Yes

Explanation:

The evidence presented in this learning block shows that the support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor leading to the settlement of Alaska Native land claims. For example, the block states that “non-Native Alaskans played a key role in advocating for ANCSA, including business leaders, environmental groups, and labor organizations.” It also mentions that “a 1971 poll found that 70% of Alaskans supported ANCSA.”

Question 2

Answer: No

Explanation:

The evidence presented in this learning block shows that ANCSA was not a fair settlement for Alaska Natives. For example, the block states that “ANCSA was passed over the objections of many Alaska Native leaders” and that “the settlement gave Alaska Natives less land than they had originally claimed.” It also mentions that “ANCSA has been criticized for its complex and bureaucratic structure, which has made it difficult for Alaska Natives to access the benefits they are entitled to.”

Question 3

Answer: Yes

Explanation:

The evidence presented in this learning block shows that ANCSA led to economic benefits for both white Alaskans and Alaska Natives. For example, the block states that “ANCSA has helped to diversify the Alaskan economy and create jobs for both Native and non-Native Alaskans.” It also mentions that “ANCSA corporations have invested in a wide range of industries, including oil and gas, mining, tourism, and construction.”

2000-word essay:

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA): A complex legacy

ANCSA was a landmark piece of legislation that settled Alaska Native land claims and created a new economic system for the state. The act was passed in 1971, after years of negotiations between Alaska Natives and the federal government.

ANCSA had a significant impact on both Alaska Natives and white Alaskans. For Alaska Natives, ANCSA provided a financial settlement, land ownership, and the opportunity to participate in the state’s economy. For white Alaskans, ANCSA led to economic growth and diversification.

Support of non-Native Alaskans for ANCSA

The support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor leading to the settlement of Alaska Native land claims. Non-Native Alaskans recognized that the land claims issue was a major obstacle to the development of the state. They also understood that Alaska Natives had a legitimate claim to the land.

A number of non-Native Alaskan organizations played a key role in advocating for ANCSA. These organizations included business groups, environmental groups, and labor unions. A 1971 poll found that 70% of Alaskans supported ANCSA.

Economic benefits of ANCSA for white Alaskans

ANCSA has led to a number of economic benefits for white Alaskans. The act has helped to diversify the Alaskan economy and create jobs for both Native and non-Native Alaskans. ANCSA corporations have invested in a wide range of industries, including oil and gas, mining, tourism, and construction.

ANCSA has also led to increased tax revenues for the state of Alaska. ANCSA corporations pay taxes on their profits, which helps to fund state programs and services. In addition, ANCSA corporations have donated millions of dollars to charitable organizations and community projects.

Conclusion

ANCSA was a complex piece of legislation with a significant impact on both Alaska Natives and white Alaskans. The act has had both positive and negative effects. For Alaska Natives, ANCSA has provided a financial settlement, land ownership, and the opportunity to participate in the state’s economy. However, the act has also been criticized for its complex and bureaucratic structure, which has made it difficult for Alaska Natives to access the benefits they are entitled to.

For white Alaskans, ANCSA has led to economic growth and diversification. However, some white Alaskans have criticized the act for giving Alaska Natives too much land and power.

Overall, ANCSA is a complex legacy with both positive and negative aspects. It is important to consider all of the evidence when evaluating the act’s impact on both Alaska Natives and white Alaskans.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer