The term victim

 

The term victim has been in use for centuries. In contemporary times, its definition has come to include people who are affected both directly and indirectly by crime, accidents, and disease. Direct and indirect victims suffer differently. After an assault, the assault victim is the direct victim, suffering from injuries and perhaps a loss of property or work. Indirect victims include family, friends, and members of the community. Family and friends may suffer due to economic or emotional hardship that is a byproduct of the crime, while the community may live in fear and may limit activity. In this Discussion, you examine how crime affects both direct and indirect victims in order to effectively address their needs.

By Day 3
Post a response to the following:

Briefly describe one property crime and one violent crime.
Identify the direct and indirect victim(s) of each crime.
Explain the effect of the crime on both direct and indirect victims and how their needs differ. For each crime, address the effects on two of these areas:
Medical
Emotional
Physical
Financial

 

Sample Solution

The term victim

The effects of crime on victims (both individuals and corporate entities) are multiple. In contrast to the effects of accidental injury or disease, research on the effects of crime has stressed mental, psychological and social effects, compared to physical or financial effects. Indeed, some have suggested that being the victim of crime is qualitatively different from being the victim of an accident or disease, because it includes someone deliberately or recklessly harming you (Shapland et al., 1985). In the FBI`s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, property crime includes the offenses of burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson. The object of the theft-type offenses is the taking of money or property, but there is no force or threat of force against the victims.

arned cash from others since they are too lethargic to even consider observing business or exploit blaming a sickness, despite the fact that they are fit for work. The media will regularly provide details regarding debilitated individuals with newsworthy stories, instead of really zeroing in on covering reality, contributing towards the disdain wrongdoing of handicapped individuals. For instance, they won’t investigate how handicapped individuals are at high gamble of wrongdoing, as this won’t sell as well as writing about how debilitated individuals are burglarizing tenacious dedicated individuals. It is as though a people demon of impaired individuals is made through the media; we should fear the individuals who are guaranteeing benefits as it is depicted as something pessimistic in the public eye. In like manner, individuals enduring with ‘undetectable’ incapacities, like melancholy, are frequently peered downward on as others don’t see an actual inability and will simply accept some unacceptable reasons concerning why they are guaranteeing benefits; there is as yet a shame around psychological maladjustment which isn’t accounted for enough on all through the media. Media inclusion like this can prompt disdain violations and separation towards debilitated individuals. For instance, research proposes that there is an alarming measure of separation focusing on debilitated individuals, which will affect their lives consistently. 56% of handicapped people have revealed they have encountered pessimistic perspectives towards them due to their condition. Moreover, half of debilitated individuals state they have really confronted separation consistently, and 37 of these people emphatically accept that perspectives and perspectives towards them from others have changed in a more over pessimistic manner; thoughts individuals hold about incapacitated individuals are deteriorating (Scope, 2018). It very well may be seen that the room charge is an assault on incapacitated individuals’ privileges and isn’t really centered around the closure of a ‘extra room endowment’; it is simply being utilized as excuse. Research has found that the vast majority of those enduring with a handicap must choose the option to lessen spending on food, taking care of bills, etc, to address the issues of the room charge, because of the reality they are being denied help from crisis lodging installments. Papworth Trust, a handicap noble cause, observed that around 33% of incapacitated people are being rejected for help from optional lodging installments, which are set up by the public authority to offer help for the individuals who experience issues in paying their lease. Moreover, around 66% of those affected by rooms expressed as ‘spare’, are actu

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.