The Third Great Error is “the error of imaginary causes

chose one of these questions to write 3 pages essay
1. The Third Great Error is “the error of imaginary causes.” What are the causes Nietzsche thinks are
imaginary? Why does he think we make up causes for things? How is it that “The entire realm of morality and
religion belongs under this concept of imaginary causes”? Do you agree, or disagree? Defend your position
with good reasons.
2. The Fourth Great Error is the error of free will.” What motives does Nietzsche find behind the doctrine of free
will? Do you think it is possible to get rid of the concepts of guilt and responsibility? Is this a good idea? Do you
agree with Nietzsche or not? Defend your position with reasons.
3. Discuss why Nietzsche holds Socrates to be decadent. Do you agree with Nietzsche’s mode of
psychological reasoning? Do you agree with his conclusions concerning Socrates and his society? Give your
reasons why you agree or disagree with Nietzsche.
4. Discuss the reason(s) why Nietzsche claims that the only healthy morality is in the formula Amor Fati. Give
your reasons why you agree or disagree.

Sample Solution

The Four Great Errors widely discussed in the context of four mistakes of human reason regarding causative connections that renowned German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche argues are the basis of all moral and religious propositions. Gaining prominence in his book Twilight of the Idols, first published in 1889, these errors are key in implementing his program of the “revaluation of all values.” This paper analyzes The Third Great Error is “the error of imaginary causes.” Nietzsche argues that when an event occurs, this event causes ideas in the mind, ideas which the subject mistakenly believes to be the cause of the original event.

War contributed greatly to Roman expansion and the territory they accumulated as a result. It has been suggested that the Romans actively sought war as a way of conquering new territory and expanding their empire. However, it seems more likely that for the most part the Romans did not make war frivolously. War was seen as an honorable and sacred act, proven by the temples built to celebrate victory and the accumulation of new gods from places they conquered. All of these traditions support the idea that Romans held war in high regard and would typically need a purpose before going to war. Their commitment to the army was so ingrained and the fear of punishment so severe that soldiers would not abandon their group even when death was certain. Polybius writes, “Men in covering forces often choose certain death, refusing to leave their ranks even when vastly outnumbered, owing to dread of punishment they would later face.” (Polybius 376) Soldiers were also a valuable asset to Rome, the power and size of the army gave Rome legitimacy to deter foreign powers from invasion but also gain support from the people of Rome. Often when a new territory was conquered their taxation would be in the form of able men to act as soldiers in the Roman army. Using the time of a valuable general or losing soldiers lives without a worthy cause would have not made sense, and therefore pointless war is an unworthy expense. This idea is supported by the rigorous requirements that go into war preparation as well as

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.