The Use of Technology in Business Law

at
Categories
Tags

 

Describe how technology is used in business law. Pretty broad topic. Explain different technological advancements that has helped. Examples such as workers working via remotely and learning remotely by using technology. Minimum of 5 sources.

Sample Solution

The Use of Technology in Business Law

Over the last five decades, the legal industry has undergone a significant transformation. What was once seen as a closely-knit profession has now become a global enterprise market. But what made this possible? While there are various factors behind the unprecedented shift in the legal market, the one that has made great strides in the last few years is legal technology. Technology influences not just how the work gets done in law firms and corporate law departments but also the volume and type of work that is being done, as well as how lawyers and legal professionals communicate with one another and their clients. As technology evolves, it presents opportunities for honing our processes, better serving clients and rethinking traditional models, all critical components of moving the legal field forward.

osophers are now discussing if automatics should be programmed to kill in extreme situations, especially self-driving cars. The companies and the engineers for the driverless cars are now participating in studies of morality, to see who the car should kill when the brake does not work. Surveys about this question are put on a website called Moral Machine and people around the world are all taking part in the surveys. Yet the results have much diversity around the world, according to Maxmen (2018), and only some moral standards are shared globally, such as saving humans in the price of pets. Most people choose to save the most, which is quite a utilitarian decision, and it is acceptable in Edmonds’ (2018) opinion. He thinks “when it comes to machines we will be more tolerant of their making utilitarian decisions.” At the same time, deontologists refuse to make immoral choices in this case that is similar to the trolley problem. Edmond(2018) further argues as humans we still have some deontological sets of mind, that in instinct we would not be willing to use human to save a human. The Kantian theorists explain that it is always the best to stop the car instead of hitting someone. In this case, utilitarianism does seem more practical because decisions have to be made, whether moral or not, but deontology reminds us these situations are extremely rare. The self-driving car problem shows the same debate philosophers had as the trolley problems, and morality seems even more complicated when it is applied to the real possible problems.

Despite the argument, there are some areas where utilitarians and deontologists reach to agreement with different perspective but the same conclusion. One of these issues is meat-consuming. Both theories state that it is immoral to eat meat out of different reasons. Bentham, the father of utilitarianism mentioned before, has a famous quote that is often used to defend animal right: “The question is not, Can they reason? Nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?” (McGregor, 2018) in utilitarianism, animal can suffer. In order to reach the maximised happiness, suffering should be re

This question has been answered.

Get Answer