THEORETICAL MODELS AND APPROACHES

at
Categories
Tags
  1. One of the challenges we face as counselors is developing our theoretical model or approach to counseling. Given the complexity and unique characteristics of each client, we know that it is impossible to have a single theory or approach that explains all human behavior. Likewise, as you read through the various etiological models or explanations of addiction, the tendency is ask “Which one is the correct model?” The answer is not so simple. All of these models are helpful and provide important information for counselors beginning their studies in addiction counseling, but no single model adequately explains why some individuals become addicted to a substance and others do not. So which is the correct one? The answer is “all of the above” as addiction is too complex to try to use one approach to explain addiction when working with a client.

Therefore, it is important to recognize that addiction is not caused by a single factor, which then requires us to integrate aspects of the various models to understand and develop treatment options for clients. For example, while there may be similarities in all addicted individuals, the etiology and motivation for the use of drugs varies from person to person. For some individuals, there may be a genetic predisposition or a physiological reason for use and later addiction to a drug. For others, addiction may be a result of a disruption in their personal development, without a known genetic predisposition or physiological dysfunction. Thus, we have to consider each model, and evaluate how it does or does not explain an aspect of the client’s addiction.

To help you in the process, you will review the 8 distinct classifications of models to explain addiction found in the textbook (Capuzzi & Stauffer, 2020, pp. 7–17):
8 Categories of Models to Explain Addiction
•The Moral Models • The Public Health Models
• Psychological Models • The Developmental Models
• Family Models • Biological Models
•The Disease Models • Sociocultural Models
For this assignment, you will write a 4–5-page paper (excluding title page and reference page) where you will begin to take a multi-causal approach. Select four (4) specific models from the above 8 categories(do not select an entire category).

Sample Solution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The reasons why some individuals become addicted to a substance and others do not is complex and can be due to a combination of biological, psychological, social and environmental factors. Biological risk factors include genetic vulnerability, differences in brain chemistry or hormones, and exposure to toxins during fetal development. Psychological risk factors include mental health issues such as anxiety or depression, low self-esteem, stress management difficulties or impulsivity. Social influences such as family dynamics or peer pressure may also contribute to addiction. Environmental influences include accessibility of drugs in the community or within the home environment, poverty and exposure to trauma.

 

 

 

 

 

legislators would have more motivations to crusade across their entire state, rather than basically battling in their solitary areas as the state vote would decide corresponding seating. Optimistically, Niel Franzese of the Connecticut Regulation Survey brings up “such a circumstance could propel citizens to partake in primaries that they had not in that frame of mind in order to make the most of a recharged opportunity to have their voices heard in another sort of essential political decision,” (Franzese, 274).

Moving to medium term results, ideological groups would turn out to be more divided as differing ideological groups would shape to catch a piece of the democratic portion. Adding to the fracture, parties that were major areas of strength for once start to debilitate, for example, how the Casual get-together has started to remove strength from the Conservative Association. On October 29, 2015, Stephanie Schriock of The Slope, guarantees the Casual get-together has previously been “fixing the legislative guide with safe conservative locale,” getting seats they regularly wouldn’t get an opportunity at winning. This pattern could extend across ideological group limits as “floor crossing” and between party alliances framed to deliver specific political decision results.

At last, the drawn out ramifications of applying Brazilian discretionary approaches to the US could demonstrate terrible. With an all around debilitating party framework, the possibilities of intrigue and pay off will rise dramatically. Moreover, as the US keeps on encountering a wilting working class, there would be cause for more noteworthy social uprisings. Adding into the class structure evaluation, “class structures have become undeniably more energized in cutting edge entrepreneur nations,” (Bastos, 153), and with unlikely portrayal overall, the polarization would keep on declining.

Presently the issue with this speculative situation is only that, it is speculative. The different ramifications that have been expressed lead one down an elusive slant that breeds cynicism and dismisses the chance of a positive result. To the extent that any political specialist can perceive, a relative framework might just be the response to fix the US polarization, taking into consideration better portrayal of regions, for example, the “neglected” moderate Rust Belt, the frank liberal West Coast, and the blended moderate/moderate East Coast. Thus, while examining what is happening, for example, this, it vital to observe that there essentially isn’t sufficient proof to help which type of a majority rules system will be more useful than another. There are many elements that become an integral factor including society, late political and social history, and eagerness to change to give some examples. In help, that’s what niel Franzese considers “an absence of convincing examinations with finding

This question has been answered.

Get Answer