Theory of knowledge called skepticism
Describe the theory of knowledge called skepticism. Consider the skeptic’s charge that we can never be confident about the reliability of our normal sources of knowledge (perceptions, memory, introspection, and reasoning.) Describe why and how, for each of the 4 sources mentioned, the source is unreliable. Use examples to show your understanding.
If a source of knowledge is unreliable, it means these sources can trick us into believing falsehoods. Does it follow from the fact that we are sometimes mistaken when we rely on these sources that we are always mistaken? In other words, once we admit is possible that we are mistaken, does that mean that we need to admit that we might never be correct? How would you respond to the skeptic?
Sample Solution
Skepticism is a philosophical theory of knowledge that focuses on the question “Do we really know what we think we know?” Skeptics argue that it is impossible to be certain about any claim or belief, and even our own senses may deceive us. This type of skepticism is sometimes referred to as radical skepticism since it doubts the reliability of all sources of knowledge, including perceptions, memory, introspection and reasoning (Krishnananda, 2020).
The skeptical charge states that due to our imperfect abilities as humans and limited access information, it is not possible for us be sure about anything. Skeptics therefore maintain that claims which cannot be proved by valid evidence should not be accepted as true; instead they encourage people consider alternative explanations those events they encounter.
One key argument made by skeptics is that the traditional methods used in science are inadequate when comes determining ultimate truth because these methods rely upon assumptions which can never definitively confirmed. Furthermore, skeptics maintain that even if something appears certain present moment does not guarantee will still remain so future given ever-changing nature world around us.
In conclusion, despite its advantages allowing individuals reflect more critically upon their beliefs before accepting them uncritically skepticism has its limitations most notably being its tendency towards cynicism leading adherents rejecting plausible theories simply due lack firm proof such cases.(Noonan & Depaul 2013).
