Theory of Learning.

 

 

 

 

Consider your own Theory of Learning. Write a 5-6 page paper (at least 1200 words) that addresses these questions:

What is your definition of learning?
Who are the prominent theorists (or theories) most aligned with your theory?
According to your theory:
What is the process of learning?
How does learning occur?
What are the important outcomes of learning?
What personal experiences have you had as a student, which contribute to this theory?
Review the following expectations for more information about the assignment:
Submit the paper by 11:59 p.m. CT Sunday.
Support your arguments with evidence from things you’ve learned in class and beyond.
Don’t simply state what you believe and not say something about what has influenced that belief and/or where that belief has come from.
Properly cite your sources when necessary.

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

Theory of Learning

We know that the human brain is immensely complex and still somewhat of a mystery. It follows then, that we understand learning, a primary function of the brain, in many different ways. From The Conditions of Learning by Robert Gagne, learning is a change in human disposition or capability that persists over a period of time and is not simply ascribable to processes of growth. Learning theories develop hypotheses that describe how this process takes place. The scientific study of learning started in earnest at the dawn of the 20th century. The major concepts and theories of learning include behaviorist theories, cognitive psychology, constructivism, social constructivism, experiential learning, multiple intelligence, and situated learning theory and community of practice.

 

 

Contrasts Between Conventional and Alternative Medicine

GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation

AlternativeDoctorThe progress of science is generally accepted to have improved the nature of numerous procedures, items, and administrations. Be that as it may, in specific circles of life, customary strategies are as yet being utilized; medication is a splendid case of the concurrence of two antipodal methodologies. Alongside ordinarily perceived regular medication dependent on science and innovation, there likewise exists elective medication, which once in a while incorporates rehearses created a large number of years back. The predominance of every one of these sorts of medication have a long-standing history, as every one of them have demonstrated its adequacy; thusly, understanding their favorable circumstances and downsides is urgent for framing one’s own perspective.

The main contrast between these two frameworks is their way to deal with analysis. Traditional medication centers around the components that cause sicknesses and helping their manifestations; each variation from the norm is viewed as a free proviso, separate from the character of an individual and their condition. In contrast to its partner, elective medication considers a to be as a harmony of interrelations between a body and its condition; in this way, an ailment is believed to be brought about by a lopsidedness between them. At the end of the day, elective medication centers preferably around purging the whole framework over on restoring its specific components (Buzzle).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.