Theory & Practice of Leadership Interview with a Leader Paper

 

 

Description

Students will select a leader in an organization (volunteer, non-profit or for-profit) and interview that individual. Leaders selected must not be current students and must not be close relatives of the interviewer. Each student will submit a 3-5 page paper describing this individual and their practice of leadership.

Steps in the Process

Interview

Contact your selected leader and arrange for an appointment with them. Your interview will probably take around 30 minutes. Be on time for your appointment, be organized and be respectful of your leader’s time. Remember – everyday leaders are all around you! Before your interview, write out the questions you intend to ask. Basic questions you should include are:
How do you define leadership?
Please describe some examples from your practice of leadership.
Have you read any books or articles on leadership that you would recommend to leadershipstudies students?
(This will give you clues as to the way your leader defines and practices leadership)Based on your leader’s replies to these questions, you will want to ask follow-up questions to clarify and define their practice of leadership. You can, of course, add other questions to explore aspects of leadership which you find most interesting and compelling.
During the interview, you may want to record the questions and answers – this will free you up to listen closely and ask questions without trying to write down everything. Be sure to ask your leader for permission to record the interview.
Post Interview

After the interview, be sure to send a thank you note to the leader in appreciation of the leader’s time.
Collect your thoughts and make notes from your recording of the interview – see if you can distill the person’s definition of leadership to a few sentences. Using the definition, examples and follow- up questions, determine how this leader’s practice of leadership fits within each of the theories we have studied so far.
Select one theory which seems most applicable to this leader, analyze and discuss similarities and differences in the heart of your paper.
Select a second theory which shows secondary similarities and analyze/discuss this as well, but more briefly than the first theory.
If you quote from our text or any other article or book, be sure to include a references page. I am not picky about whether you use MLA or APA format, just don’t pass off another’s work as your own. Since the subject of the paper is your interview with the leader, you do not have to cite the interview if you relate quotes from the leader.
A brief conclusion, wrapping up your learning about this leader from your interview will bring your paper to a close.
Your paper must be printed, double-spaced, on white paper in a 12-pt. font. You must have a title page that lists the title of your paper, your name, the date and the course number. Staple the leader’s business card to the paper.
Some Helpful Hints

Contact your leader NOW if you have not done so already. Leaders are busy people and so are you as a student – it may take some time to coordinate an interview.
You might want to pick someone in your intended profession – this can serve as a great time to network. Several students in previous years have arranged internships or gotten jobs with the leader after interviewing them. This interview can help you get a foot in the door.
While you can’t interview a C.U. student or a relative of yours, you can use those people to refer you to a leader to interview. Current C.U. employees can be great subjects for your interview.
Take enough time writing your paper that you proofread well. Run spellcheck. Don’t just write down the questions you asked and the answers to them – analyze! This should NOT be simply a transcript of your interview.
Don’t forget to ask for a business card. The business card of the individual interviewed must be attached to the paper when it is submitted.
Do not take up pages of your paper explaining the resume of the leader you chose. This is a paper about this person’s PRACTICE of leadership, not about their accomplishments. A couple of sentences in your introduction about why you chose this leader will suffice.Grading CriteriaThe Interview with a Leader papers will be evaluated based on the following criteria:Content (125 points possible): Does the paper follow the content guidelines in the assignment? Is the analysis of the leader’s practice of leadership scholarly and logical? Does the student cite at least 2 theories from our course and compare the leader’s practice to those? Does the student appear to understand the theories and definitions they are applying? Are the arguments made clearly? Does the student explain why they selected this leader and how this leader defines leadership? Are examples used to reinforce the points the student makes? Does it feel like the student has taken adequate care to write a concise, yet thorough, analysis? Higher order thinking skills (Bloom’s Taxonomy) are expected in this assignment.Structure of Paper, Grammar & Spelling (50 points possible): Is there a logical beginning, middle & end? Does the student state ideas, support them with examples and then conclude that idea before transitioning to the next? Are there any run on or fragment sentences? Are there spelling errors? Do the sentences make sense? Are format requirements met (length of paper, cite references, etc.)? NOTE: The paper should be between 3 & 5 pages, not counting the title page and reference page. References do not have to be on their own page, but a title page is required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

 

An examination concerning the degree of shame experienced by individuals living with schizophrenia.

Survey

When leading examination into the disgrace that accompanies living with schizophrenia, it tends to be exceedingly hard to acquire exact data. This report will give an assortment of conceivable research plans that could be utilized in the given situation, and by investigating various information accumulation alternatives we can assess which strategies will be the best when attempting to get precise and solid information.

The Diary Method is outstanding in mental research and is getting to be utilized all the more much of the time (Bolger, et al. 2003). It includes the member making every day composed records of their own considerations and suppositions, of specific encounters (Iida, et al. 2012). There are three classifications of journal thinks about; interim unforeseen conventions, signal-unexpected conventions and occasion unexpected conventions (Wheeler and Reis, 1991). The journal technique that would be best utilized with this situation would be the occasion unforeseen conventions. By utilizing this structure technique, it implies that the member is required to give a self-report each time the occasion being referred to happens. For this situation, it will be the point at which the member feels that they have been dependent upon shame because of their schizophrenia.

One of the primary focal points of utilizing the journal strategy is that scientists can assemble information in the members regular day to day existences, which means they can stop and archive the occasion. This is exceedingly significant when working with people with schizophrenia, as it has been appeared in an examination done by Alexiadou et al in 2018, that shortages were appeared in verbose and semantic recollections of occasions, certainties and notwithstanding in regards to explicitly reviewed occasions. By diminishing the measure of time between the member encountering the occasion and recording it, it will essentially expand the legitimacy of occasions review (Almeida, 2005).

Notwithstanding, one of the fundamental issues with the journal strategy is that the members may not dependably recognize each significant occasion. This can be because of miscommunication between the analyst and the member or, all the more generally, the people possess point of view of what shame towards them and their psychological instability truly is (Gunthert, 2012). This can prompt occasions not being reported, and along these lines diminishes the inquires about dependability (Iida, 2012). In spite of the fact that, if the occasion being archived is more mind boggling than no doubt, the member has no restriction to the amount they record after the occasion that happened. Giving an a lot further knowledge into the members feelings and prosperity. By utilizing this methodology, it will enable wonders and procedures to be evaluated in their normal settings instead of a controlled research facility setting (Ebner-Priemer and Kubiak, 2007).

Another exploration strategy that could be utilized would be a self-controlled online poll. This poll will contain both open and shut inquiries. The primary preferred position to this strategy, over the journal technique, is that it takes into account significantly more productive examination of the discoveries (Cantrell, et al. 2007). Just as this, this kind of research takes into consideration fast information gathering, as we can send a survey to any individual who fits the criteria for it, which for this situation is schizophrenia. This will give us access to an enormous example of members.

Then again, by utilizing this kind of survey, the example is constrained. As the people partaking in the poll must approach a PC or some type of electronic gadget wherein to get to it, this implies all people who don’t approach such gadgets are promptly expelled from the example. Making the outcomes less generalisable (Le Fever, et al. 2007). Be that as it may, with the bigger example size that the online poll would give, some contend that the disposal of a select gathering would have an insignificant impact of the outcomes (Van Selm, et al. 2006).

As expressed before, online overviews enable a specialist to arrive at gigantic measures of individuals in a short measure of time, in spite of potentially being isolated by incredible geographic separations (Taylor, 2000). This isn’t just a preferred position since it enables access to a bigger populace but since it has additionally been appeared to spare time for analysts (Wright, 2017). Notwithstanding, because of the constrained data that can be gotten by means of an online survey, the greatest burden is that it has absence of knowledge and profundity into the individual and why they’ve said what they’ve said. By utilizing the Diary technique, the specialist can pick up understanding to every occasion of disgrace that the members experience. While most, if not all, of this data is lost when utilizing an online survey.

Proposed Design

Plan

This exploration will be directed utilizing semi-organized meetings (SSI). The meetings will occur at a similar area, every member will have their very own designated schedule vacancy in which to land at the set area. Every member will be asked the equivalent SSI inquiries, given to them by a SSI direct.

Members

Members will be found utilizing the emotional wellness administration. Everybody that meets the criteria will be reached and allowed the chance to participate in the exploration. 6 members are required and the example size was chosen following past investigations, for example, Smith et al, (1999). All members must give a medicinal structure affirming finding of schizophrenia, must be between the ages of 25 – 65 with no other comorbid conditions.

Materials

A semi-organized meeting aide will be accommodated every analyst playing out the meetings. This will contain a progression of inquiries with prompts that the specialists can use to advance the meeting. Preparation structures will likewise be required for every member alongside a questioning structures. A timetable for all the vacancies for each meeting will likewise be required.

Technique

A scientist will meet the member at the concurred area, which will be some place peaceful and private, at the chose time. The analyst will pose an opening inquiry, to settle the member into the discussion (Cridland, 2015). The primary meeting at that point starts, utilizing the SSI guide gave. The meeting should last at any rate an hour members must know that all sound is recorded from these sessions (Pietkiewicz, et al. 2014). Before the meeting starts the specialist must affirm that the member completely comprehends the brief and their entitlement to pull back from the meeting whenever. When the member has affirmed they comprehend the meeting can start. The specialist directing the meeting ought to pursue the SSI guide gave, yet don’t be shocked if different themes are brought into the discussion by the member. Members should in any case be locked in with when they stray from the guide, as more extensive subject investigation is perfect for SSI’s (Smith, 2011). This makes it feasible for the scientist and member to participate in a discourse, which enables further inquiries to be altered all things considered of the other members’ (Smith, 2015). When the meeting is finished the member can be questioned.

Investigation

When the sum total of what meetings have been directed, the accounts must be changed over into a transcript. Every transcript is then perused and explained, recognizing what you accept is to be the most intriguing or noteworthy, words or expression, in what the member said (Pietkiewicz, et al. 2012). When this has been done, the scientist returns to the comments that have recently been made and starts the procedure once more. This is called sectioning (Husserl, 1999. In The Essential Husserl). All condensed segments and explanations become increasingly compact and explicit, adjusting a more significant level of reflection (Smith, et al. 1997). All while doing this, the scientist must ensure that they are returning over the first transcript to guarantee that the expressions or subjects that have been picked, interface back to what the member at first said (Eatough, et al. 2008).

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer