There are many cases in which an individual has been convicted on circumstantial evidence for the crime of murder.
There are many cases in which an individual has been convicted on circumstantial evidence for the crime of murder. Find a recent and local case in your home state in which a person has been found guilty of murder or a varied degree of homicide. Summarize the case in your main post. Indicate the reasons for the conviction. Was it based on physical or circumstantial evidence? What did the prosecutor use to prove the mental intent of the offender at the time of the crime?
The Case of Wesley Brownlee
Wesley Brownlee was convicted of murdering five people in Stockton, California in 2019. The victims were all homeless men, and they were found dead in different locations around the city. Brownlee was arrested after DNA evidence linked him to the murders.
The prosecution's case against Brownlee was based on circumstantial evidence. There were no eyewitnesses to the murders, and no murder weapon was ever found. However, the prosecution presented a compelling case that Brownlee was the killer.
The prosecution's case included the following evidence:
- Brownlee's DNA was found on the bodies of two of the victims.
- Brownlee was seen in the area where the bodies were found.
- Brownlee had a history of violence against homeless people.
- Brownlee was arrested with a knife that was similar to the weapon used in the murders.