Time Management Techniques

 

 

 

In the Time Management Techniques page you read about several Time Management Techniques – so now it’s time to put one of them into practice!

For this assignment, complete PART 1 (Weekly Schedule) first and then, at the end of the week, complete PART 2.

*** You will submit both Parts 1 & 2 for the Weekly Calendar Assignment

PART 1: Weekly Schedule = take a few minutes on Monday and, using the Weekly Schedule

Actions, block out all of your time commitments for this week

Examples of things you should block out on the Weekly Schedule

Actions:

Class times
Study time
Practice (for student-athletes)
Games (for student-athletes)
Work
Travel to work
Other daily activities – gym, dinner with friends/family, church
Any other appointments – doctor’s apt, car maintenance, etc.
PART 2: Once you’ve completed the week, take a moment to compare how you spent your time this week versus how you planned it on your Weekly Schedule

Actions , then answer the following questions . Must be typed and a minimum of two paragraphs (no bullet points):

Describe your current time management techniques (that you used in either high school or college).
Do you use any tools or techniques related to time management?
How did you remember when assignments were due?
2. Using the Weekly ScheduleActions you created for this assignment, evaluate how your planned time compared on the Weekly Schedule with your actual week?
Did you stick to your planned schedule?
How did you spend most of your time?
What do want or need to make time for?
How can you make more time for these thing(s)?
3. How do you plan to use the Calendar in Canvas?
According to your Canvas Calendar, what is the first assignment you have due this semester?
According to your Canvas Calendar, what is the last assignment you have due this semester?
4. Conclusion:
What did you learn from using this time management tool?
What time management tool(s) are you open to trying out this semester?

 

Sample Solution

When it comes to managing my time in high school and college, I have developed several different techniques that help me stay on top of my tasks. One of the most effective strategies is using a planner. In both high school and college, I used a physical planner that was divided into sections for each day of the week so I could easily write down any upcoming due dates or events. This allowed me to quickly check what needed to be done each day without having to search through emails or syllabi for specific details.

I also use online tools such as Google Calendar which allows me to set reminders for important deadlines and sync up with my phone so I can get notifications no matter where I am. This has been great for long term planning because it helps me track larger assignments over multiple weeks or months. Furthermore, the calendar feature allows me to see how busy each day will be so if there’s a lot on one particular day then I can plan accordingly by spreading out other tasks throughout the week.

Finally, when studying for exams or completing assignments that are not due until later in the semester, I like to break them into smaller chunks so they do not become too overwhelming. By scheduling shorter amounts of time throughout each week dedicated solely towards this task, it reduces stress associated with procrastination and ensures that everything gets completed on time when its due date arrives.

Overall, these methods have helped keep myself organized while managing all aspects of schoolwork including assignments due in class as well as those submitted online through Blackboard or Moodle systems (Kaufman & Engels, 2020). Knowing exactly what needs to be done ahead of time keeps stress levels low and allows ample room for extracurricular activities and socializing which is important not only during times of educational pursuits but also after graduation as career building skills are acquired along the way!

In practically every one of the models over, the progressions include the execution of continuous and less conventional execution registrations to zero in on improvement, and a more grounded accentuation on standard criticism utilizing innovation. There is a developing pattern to cancel/deprioritise execution examinations with regular, casual registrations among chiefs and representatives across various businesses. Innovation organizations have driven the way (for example Adobe, Juniper Frameworks, Dell, Microsoft, and IBM), joined by proficient administrations firms (for example Deloitte, Accenture, PwC), early adopters in different businesses (for example Hole, Lear, OppenheimerFunds), and, surprisingly, the utilities goliath General Electric, that was a long-lasting good example for conventional examinations (Cappelli and Tavis, 2016).

This likewise shows a shift from Hypothesis X, which recommends that associations should propel workers with material prizes and discipline to Hypothesis Y, which contends that representatives need to perform well and will do so whenever upheld appropriately (McGregor, 1957).

3.3 Viable Ramifications OF Abrogating OR DEPRIORITISING

3.3.1 Information catch and data over-burden

Assuming execution evaluations are nullified/deprioritised, they should be supplanted with a framework that is capable track work designs. This calls for incessant and constant discussions among administrators and representatives, for instance when issues become visible or project/task has been finished. Cappelli and Tavis (2016) contend that his will permit chiefs to quickly resolve issues in current execution and foster future abilities.

In any case, with a move towards constant and successive criticism, the quantity of information focuses will without a doubt increment. Cappelli and Tavis (2016) characterize this as criticism firehose, which can prompt data over-burden. Moreover, whist HR frameworks play had a significant impact in execution examinations (Sulsky and Keown, 1998), their plan is restricted to reporting execution evaluations, and consequently these current frameworks are not generally ready to oblige consistent criticism.

This expects associations to contemplate HR frameworks and how criticism will be gathered, ordered and gave to representatives (for example versatile applications, online instruments). Getting this right is significant as criticism is emphatically connected with work fulfillment, which can be connected to higher efficiency and execution (Fletcher and Williams, 1996)

3.3.2 Social perspectives

A large part of the exploration distributed on execution evaluations begins from created nations. Representatives inside UK and USA will generally respond diversely to criticism, regardless of having similitudes in culture (Early and Stubblebine, 1989). Thusly, scholarly exploration needs to think about the way of life elements of different societies, especially in the arising economies.

In addition, canceling/deprioritising execution evaluations to zero in on constant and multi-source criticism, enables administrators to give basic appraisals across the association’s progressive system. This approach can be met fluctuating responses in view of the social foundations of

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.