Nosocomial infections are a highly monitored risk within health care facilities. “Medicare ceased payment for some hospital-acquired infections beginning October 1, 2008, following provisions in the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 and the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.” (Peasah et al., 2013) There is currently a list of fourteen (14) hospital acquired conditions designated by CMS as high cost, high volume, potential higher payment DRG, and preventable using evidence-based practice. (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2013) Infection prevention and control are integral parts of any facility risk management plan. The fundamental first step in infection control is hand washing. It is drilled into nursing students’ brains during their program. It is often joked about as the answer to every test question…hand washing! However, this practice is a vital first line defense to cease the cross contamination between patients. “Practicing hand hygiene is a simple yet effective way to prevent infections. Cleaning your hands can prevent the spread of germs, including those that are resistant to antibiotics and are becoming difficult, if not impossible, to treat. On average, health care providers clean their hands less than half of the times they should. On any given day, about one in 31 hospital patients has at least one health care-associated infection.” (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019) This simple act has been proven by the CDC as a highly effective preventative measure in the spread of disease.
Fall prevention is another high risk in health care facilities. Intake procedures include a fall risk assessment. Many facilities utilize a wrist band system that designates a patient at high risk for falls. “It is during the initial and reassessment procedures that risk factors associated with falls, allergies, DNR status or restricted extremity are identified or modified. Because this is an interdisciplinary process, it is important to identify who has responsibility for applying and removing color-coded bands, how this information is documented and how it is communicated.” (PATIENT SAFETY: COLOR BANDING Standardization and Implementation Manual, n.d.) The use of a designated color wrist band to identify a patient at risk for falls immediately enacts fall risk precautions designed to protect the patient’s safety and mitigate this risk. Staff education regarding the color coding, identification, and fall risk precautions to be implemented is as critical as the identification process. These actions have decreased fall injury greatly and assisted staff with rapid identification of this risk factor.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes a list of health care-acquired conditions (HACs) that reasonably could have been prevented through the application of risk management strategies. What actions has your health care organization (or have health care organizations in general) implemented to manage or prevent these “never events” from happening within their health care facilities? Support your response with a minimum two peer-reviewed articles
JJC. In processing low-level cases in precisely the same manner as more serious cases, BPD exposes young people to the harmful effects of arrest, which may create more harm than good to the young person and the interests of public safety
The DJS’s annual Data Resource Guide indicates that “juvenile detention may be authorized by DJS intake officers on a temporary basis at the request of a law enforcement officer . . . .” The resource guide further depicts that only after being taken into custody and screened for diversion at the law enforcement level, DJS performs a screening for secure detention admission using the DRAI detention screen on a young person only after the police officer requests secure detention. However, CCLP was unable to confirm that youth were screened for detention only if detention was requested by law enforcement. Indeed, stakeholder interviews revealed that it is common practice for DJS intake to conduct the DRAI screening for all youth brought to the BCJJC by law enforcement, even youth who will eventually be diverted.
This is concerning for a number of reasons. Again, processing low-level cases in the manner that is appropriate for more serious cases can expose a young person to undue harm. In addition to the harms associated with arrest and transport, extensive and unnecessary processing once at the BCJJC exposes the young person to further detriment and keeps the young person separated from home, school, and community. Also, once DJS performs the RAI screen, the information gathered and score that is generated will remain a part of the young person’s juvenile justice history and may influence processing and case disposition should the young person come into contact with the justice system at a later time.