Transformational Leadership

at
Categories
Tags

 

PowerPoint Presentation on Northouse’s Chapter 8, Transformational Leadership.

Here are the questions you should address?
• What does transformational leadership mean to you?
• What are the important points of this chapter and their significance in your transformational leadership?
• What have you learned from the chapter? Remember, we discussed the following:
 Pseudo-transformational leadership.
 Laissez-faire leadership.
 Management-by-example passive.
 Management-by-example active.
 Contingency reward.
 Transactional leadership.
 Transformational leadership.
 Charismatic leadership.
• How is transformational leadership different from your perception of leadership to this point?
• What do you like about transformational leadership or being a transformational leader? What resonates with you?
• What do you not like about transformational leadership or being a transformational leader?
• What (where) are the strengths of transformational leadership?
• What (where) are the weaknesses of transformational leadership?
• How does your leadership style relate to transformational theory? Are you a transformational leader? Why, or why not? (Hint: Reflect on the five “I”s of transformational leadership).
• How would you use/apply transformational leadership in your life (life at home, life at work, life in your community)?

 

Sample Solution

Transformational leadership is a management style that encourages, inspires, and motivates employees to innovate and create change in order to assist the organization grow and influence its future success. This is accomplished through executives leading by example with a strong sense of corporate culture, employee ownership, and workplace independence. Transformational leaders inspire and motivate their teams without micromanaging; instead, they trust their staff to make decisions in their areas of responsibility. It’s a management style that encourages staff to be more creative, think ahead, and come up with fresh answers to old problems.

arian theory is based on the belief that a moral decision is based on the outcome of the action, if that action produces the most benefit and maximizes utility for the greater number of people in a population, then it is morally sound (Holland, 2015). Based on this perspective, banning of CEDs would benefit majority of people by leading to a healthier population. Energy drinks being consumed not only negatively impacts the person consuming it, but it also puts a burden on the healthcare system due to the increase in the amount of cases related to CED consumptions in hospitals. Outlawing the sale of CEDs to persons under 16 would minimize the amount of people being hospitalized as a result of consumption of these drinks and therefore, increase the utility of health care systems for everyone. Burden of emergency visits to the hospitals would reduce because according to studies hospitalizations due to energy drink consumption increased by a double between 2007 and 2011 (NCCIH, 2018). Utilitarianism perspective would support the outlawing because this would help in the reduction of hospitalization in Quebec which in turn would increase utility and benefit majority of the people.

Mill’s harm principle believes power can be justly exercised over members of a community even against their will, when it is an act that will prevent harm to others (Holland, 2014). This principle would support the outlawing the consumption of Caffeinated Energy Drinks among persons younger than 16, this is due to the fact that other actions put into place to reduce consumption in the past have not been effective. There have been different measures put in place by the government in other to restrict the way these CEDs are produced and also consumed (NCCIH, 2018). The harm principle would support outlawing of Caffeinated Energy Drinks by Government of Quebec because energy drinks have a lot of side effects which are more dangerous to children and young adults (NCCIH, 2018). Although, these regulations have helped reduce the health impacts that are associated with consumptions of these beverages, outlawing them among persons under 16 years of age would help curtail the harms associated with them among these grou

This question has been answered.

Get Answer