Tthe factors that formulate a case for one group of offenders

 

Critically discuss the factors that formulate a case for one group of offenders, the circumstances under which the offender is not capable to stand a trial and how to avoid malingering

Sample Solution

The factors that formulate a case for one group of offenders

Criminal profiling is one tool available to investigate agencies that may assist in narrowing suspect tools, linking crimes, providing relevant leads and new investigative strategies, and keeping the overall investigation on track (Turvey, 2008). Determining sentences for criminals depends on various factors. Before analyzing these factors, familiarity with some background information is helpful. In accordance with due process requirements, a criminal defendant cannot stand trial if he or she is deemed legally incompetent. A defendant may move at any time for a hearing to determine competency, which involves the submission of supporting evidence and some form of a psychological evaluation.

thing. He began to wonder if he exists. “I think, I exist.” He had previously concluded that the world, minds, bodies, etc. did not exists and then began to doubt the existence of himself. But, to have been able to doubt this and to have the “deceiver” deceive him into thinking that he does not exist, then he concludes that he must exist in order to have been deceived. Descartes argues that even assuming there is an evil spirit who constantly deceives me, it is certain that my own self exists: for the very notion of an evil spirit assumes that the spirit deceives someone; me. So even if constantly deceived, I can’t doubt that I exist. Descartes holds that the sentence “I exist” must be true whenever I think it to myself. I may utterly deceive as to what I believe but even the most radical doubt of all, which is doubting my own existence, must imply that I exist. He creates the phrase, “cogito ergo sum.” This means, I think therefore I am. So according to Descartes, if he is able to think and reason, he exists. But in addition to that he can sense and imagine. However, Descartes believes that the senses and imagination are not trustworthy. Our senses are sometimes wrong and are not reliable, and therefore doubt is necessary. Our imagination has the ability to make up things that do not exist, and for that reason it is not reliable to knowing our essence. The ability to reason and our intellect prove to be much more reliable to knowing than the body and senses are.

The third meditation is titled “ The existence of God.” In his third meditation, Descartes states, “…as far as my parents are concerned, even if everything is true of them that I have ever thought to be so, certainly they do not conserve me in being, nor did they in any way produce me insofar as I am a thinking thing…” (Descartes 36). Here, he explains that he believes God was the one who created him, not his parents. God allowed for him to have the ability to think and reason, which is why he believes in the existence of God. After coming to the conclusion that he does exist, Descartes atte

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.