When two case managers from different organizations both have responsibility for a patient, it can create potential problems for the patient, their family, and the physician. This situation most often occurs when an individual is receiving healthcare services from multiple providers or organizations—such as if they receive treatment at a clinic in addition to home care services (Gomes et al., 2018).
By having two separate case managers overseeing care for an individual—it can lead to confusion about who should be contacted in times of need or discrepancies between plans of action that may arise due to lack of communication/collaboration between the involved parties. This could potentially cause delays in treatments & prevent individuals from receiving necessary care they require.
For families, this could result in feelings of being overwhelmed due to lack of guidance & navigation when dealing with various medical professionals. Additionally, there’s also potential danger that duplicate tests/treatments may be provided which leads to increased costs & wastage of resources. For physicians, this presents a challenge of making sure all stakeholders are on the same page so that best decisions can be made for patients.
Overall, it is clear that having two case managers responsible for one person has its drawbacks—however these issues can largely be avoided by promoting collaboration between all parties involved and working together towards common goal: providing high quality healthcare regardless where care is received.
Retribution in Hamlet and The Revenger’s Tragedy
In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s retribution, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the writer ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Despite the fact that their fundamental topic and shows are comparative, the two plays show a differentiating picture of retribution; as opposed to “Justice fighter’s misfortune”, Hamlet is an increasingly complex of his hero Provide treatment constrained by the creator’s social data and lacking
Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the vengeance of the renaissance (“misfortune of retribution”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of vengeance, Shakespeare entangles the fundamental retribution plot by making three retribution plots. By including significant developments, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is definitely not a physical legend yet a phantom, not an apparition, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint
Misfortune of retribution of Hamlet Shakespeare’s misfortune dramatization “Hamlet” is for the most part viewed as a misfortune of vengeance by artistic pundits. This article is proposed to clarify how Hamlet satisfies the requests of misfortune. In this reality that Hamlet about totally demonstrates that it is the awfulness of vengeance, this dramatization relates to the outflow of the “run of the mill” retribution misfortune of the Elizabethan time. Felice Abrams and Alan Brody invigorated us a progressively predictable consistency in “misfortune equation of Hamlet and Elizabeth’s retribution”: Hamlet’s demise remembers 10 passings for Hamlet There is “imaginary”
Hamlet and vengeance are hopeless organizations attempting retribution and those looking for retribution (Hamlet) in the long run face passing after the wrongdoing. History of misfortune of retribution Prosser’s view on Hamlet’s retribution “Legends are encouraged to fight back, as most misfortunes of retaliation, casualties or wrongdoings are straightforwardly identified with the hero” (Prosser) notwithstanding Hamlet There is likewise a play of Shakespeare. The impacts of the awfulness of vengeance incorporate Julius Caesar, Macbeth and Andronis. In Shakespeare ‘s paper by Shakespeare, Shakespeare centers around retribution and builds up the idea of death in the play. What is the awfulness of the retribution of the Elizabethan period? This is a misfortune, its thought process is retribution, and its primary plot incorporates the procedure of counter. The awfulness of vengeance in the end prompted the passing of the killer and the Avengers himself. In misfortune of retribution, we need three letters.
