UF football fan base

 

 

 

Description

In this paper, devise an argument about a specific subculture that either traces what caused an event or problem, or projects a potential effect. Attention to the quality of evidence and logic will be especially important for this paper.

First, identify a subculture that you would like to consider more carefully. A “subculture” is a small subset of people within a larger culture. For example, skateboarders might be considered a youth subculture and hipsters might be considered an artistic counterculture (or a subculture of the educated middle class). The subculture may be one that has not been identified in popular culture or talked about by academics. In other words, you may by the first to recognize that a particular group of people is worth taking a look at.

Considering this group of people, do one of two things: 1) argue that a particular circumstance led to the formation of the subculture, or 2) explain what causes a problem within or faced by this subculture. Though of course one might analyze the causes of some positive thing (e.g., the Dali Lama and other scholars have written books on the causes of happiness), most academics are interested in problems that need to be understood and, ultimately, solved (e.g., the causes of physical or social ills, such as homelessness).

Your analysis may deal with a single cause or multiple causes, but you will be held to the requirement that the causal relationships you describe be proven convincingly.

Finally, assemble the evidence that you collect in an organized and thoughtful manner, and frame the essay as an analytical argument. Your thesis will be simply that one thing causes another. Base your argument on your real-world experience, prior knowledge, and things that you have observed directly as your evidence to support your claims (personal interviews are acceptable). Therefore, you may NOT use secondary research or sources found online for this assignment.

 

 

Sample Solution

Thirdly, Vittola argues that war should be avoided (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we should proceed circumstances diplomatically. This is supported by the “last resort” stance in Frowe, where war should not be permitted unless all measures to seek diplomacy fails (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This means war shouldn’t be declared until one party has no choice but to declare war, in order to protect its territory and rights, the aim of war. However, we can also argue that the war can never be the last resort, given there is always a way to try to avoid it, like sanctions or appeasement, showing Vittola’s theory is flawed. Fourthly, Vittola questions upon whose authority can demand a declaration of war, where he implies any commonwealth can go to war, but more importantly, “the prince” where he has “the natural order” according to Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is further supported by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a king is the natural superior of his subjects.’ However, he does later emphasise to put all faith in the prince is wrong and has consequences; a thorough examination of the cause of war is required along with the willingness to negotiate rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is supported by the actions of Hitler are deemed unjustly. Also, in today’s world, wars are no longer fought only by states but also non-state actors like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s normative claim on authority is outdated. This is further supported by Frowe’s claim that the leader needs to represent the people’s interests, under legitimate authority, which links on to the fourth condition: Public declaration of war. Agreed with many, there must be an official announcement on a declaration of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63). Finally, the most controversial condition is that wars should have a reasonable chance of success. As Vittola reiterated, the aim of war is to establish peace and security; securing the public good. If this can’t be achieved, Frowe argues it would be better to surrender to the enemy. This can be justified because the costs of war would have been bigger (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.