Using appropriate supporting evidence in the form of data and/or figures, as well as appropriate evidence from the academic literature, critically discuss why, over the period 1950 to present, UK GDP per capita grew more slowly than the GDP per capita of
EITHER
a) China
OR
b) India
OR
c) Japan
The UK has seen slower growth in GDP per capita than countries such as China, India and Japan over the period 1950 to present. This can be attributed to a number of factors. Firstly, when looking at GDP per capita the size of a country’s population must also be taken into account; with larger populations generally resulting in lower average incomes (Chen et al., 2017). As such since 1950 both China and India have experienced much higher rates of population growth compared to the UK, particularly due to their introduction of birth control policies towards the end of this time frame (UNFPA, 2013).
Secondly, as Figure 1 demonstrates these two nations have benefited greatly from increasing global trade links which has allowed them access to new markets and resources. By comparison meanwhile it could be argued that the UK’s export market is more limited given its smaller size and geographical position (Dinh & Nguyen 2018).
Figure 1 – Annual Change In Exports Of Goods And Services (%)
[INSERT FIGURE HERE]
Source: OECD Economic Outlook Database 2019.
Finally, whilst having similar levels of investment in education during this period as Japan and South Korea does suggest that there is potential for further economic development within Britain – evidence shows that other constraints exist which are impeding faster growth. For example research suggests that instability generated by Brexit may hinder foreign investment in business projects or constrain immigration flows which could otherwise help drive productivity upwards (Ming & Zhou 2016).
In summary then, we see how various underlying causes explain why the UK’s GDP per capita has grown slower than China, India or Japan since 1950 – namely its smaller population base, less developed export market and political uncertainty.
understudies. Given the expected worth of such figures propelling scholastic achievement and hence impacting results like maintenance, wearing down, and graduation rates, research is justified as it might give understanding into non-mental techniques that could be of possible benefit to this populace (Lamm, 2000) . Part I: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY Introduction The country is encountering a basic lack of medical care suppliers, a deficiency that is supposed to increment in the following five years, similarly as the biggest populace in our country’s set of experiences arrives at the age when expanded clinical consideration is essential (Pike, 2002). Staffing of emergency clinics, centers, and nursing homes is more basic than any time in recent memory as the enormous quantities of ‘people born after WW2’s start to understand the requirement for more continuous clinical mediation and long haul care. Interest in turning into a medical caretaker has disappeared as of late, presumably because of the historical bac