Understanding of the history of chemistry

at
Categories
Tags

identify your selection. Give the history of the person, his/her research that won them the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Also, share the process as to how the winner is chosen. Finally, state why you selected this person in your assignment. You may use the “Online Librarian” to assist in your research.

Part 2: Provide feedback to me if this assisted in giving you a better understanding of the history of chemistry, and what could be done differently (three paragraph maximum).

 

Sample Solution

Understanding of the history of chemistry

Chemistry took its present scientific form in the 18th century, when careful quantitative experiments by Lavoisier, Proust, and Dalton resulted in the law of definite proportions, the law of conservation of mass, and the law of multiple proportions, which laid the groundwork for Dalton`s atomic theory of matter. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1901 was awarded to Jacobus Henricus Van `t Hoff in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered by the discovery of the laws of chemical and osmotic pressure in solutions. Jacobus was a Dutch physical chemist. A highly influential theoretical chemist of his time, Van `t Hoff was the first winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

The use of the death penalty is embedded throughout history, but what is its place in our modern society? Despite the development of more liberal ideas, capital punishment, which is a direct violation of human rights, is still a feature of many justice systems around the world today.

After completing volunteer work for a public pressure group, named Amicus, providing representation for American citizens on death row, I was exposed to the severity of this issue. The death penalty deprives people of the most basic human right; the right to life. Therefore, it is not a question of whether or not we should defend the right to life but rather how we should defend it. Thus, I have decided to research the question; ‘Is it more effective to defend the right to life through the law or through public pressure groups?’

Amicus only works with prisoners on death row in the United States and so I have decided to concentrate the focus of this research question in that region. Therefore, I will be concentrating on American legislation when dealing with the issue of the law in comparison to public pressure groups.

When approaching this question, we must clarify the meaning of ‘public pressure groups.’ A widely accepted definition is ‘an organised group that does not put up candidates for election, but seeks to influence government policy or legislation.’ However, this definition does not specify exactly how the pressure groups persuade the government. This minor detail can determine whether a pressure group is successful or not. Some pressure groups believe that in order to achieve their goal, they must organise violent protests and rallies. Others take a more peaceful approach, such as writing letters to members of parliament or running non-violent campaigns. Amicus is best described as the latter, as they use the law itself to f

This question has been answered.

Get Answer