Must all cultural objects be meaningful? Why or why not? Think of and list examples of US cultural objects that seem saturated with meaning and others that seem meaningless. Why are some so exalted and others so ignored? How can both be part of the same culture? Is this distinction of meaningful and meaningless akin to Durkheim’s distinction between the sacred and the profane? Why or why not?
No, not all cultural objects need to have inherent meaning to be considered cultural objects. Here’s why:
Examples:
Why the Distinction?
Durkheim’s Sacred and Profane:
There are similarities to Durkheim’s ideas. The sacred objects (like the flag) inspire reverence and respect, separate from the ordinary (profane) objects like a coffee cup. However, the distinction isn’t always clear-cut. A blue jean jacket might be ordinary wear, but become a symbol of rebellion for a subculture like punk rockers.
In conclusion, cultural objects don’t need inherent meaning to be cultural. Their significance is subjective and evolves over time. Both “meaningful” and “meaningless” objects can be part of a culture, reflecting different aspects of shared experiences and values.