The elements of Use Case diagram include actors, use cases, subject boundaries, and a set of relationships among actors which may include extends and generalization.
You were hired by Hilltop Motors as a consultant to help the company plan a new information system. Hilltop is an old-line dealership, and the prior owner was slow to change. A new management team has taken over, and they are eager to develop a first-class system. Right now, you are reviewing the service department, which is going through a major expansion. You decide to create a model of the service department in the form of a use case diagram. The main actors in the service operation are customers; service writers, who prepare work orders and invoices; and mechanics, who perform the work. You are meeting with the management team tomorrow morning. Create a draft of the diagram to present to them by developing a Use Case Diagram and Use Case Description.
In addition to the diagram there is also a description of each use case which explains how each actor should interact within the model. For example, when processing a repair order (use case), customers provide information about their vehicle such as make and model as well as details about their issue. Service writers then review this information and create an estimate for any repairs that need to be made before presenting it to the customer for approval. Once approved, work orders will be created for mechanics who will perform the necessary work on site before returning it back to the customer.
After all of this has been completed, service writers will generate an invoice detailing all services rendered along with labor costs associated with them. Customers can then pay for these services either by cash or credit card depending on what they prefer; once payment has been received it is recorded in Hilltop Motors’ system and automatically sent out via email or mail depending on the customer’s preference.
Overall, this Use Case Diagram provides a comprehensive view into how Hilltop Motors operates its service department by outlining key interaction points between customers, service writers and mechanics through detailed descriptions accompanying each use case. This allows management teams like Hilltop’s to better understand their business operations so that they can continue providing excellent customer experiences while increasing overall profits.
Retribution
Love of retribution is unusual. It is incredible, free and visually impaired. What’s more, a ton of fun proceeds. In any case, what happens regularly after affection is something contrary to cherish. At the point when an individual loses love, there is a progression of feelings that they will get. One of the darkest, most grounded and most conspicuous feelings that happen to individuals is vengeance. Pot and The Scarlet Letter are great and old stories dependent on affection, lost love, and vengeance. In The Scarlet Letter, Chillingsworth and Hester should experience passionate feelings for.
In this article we will examine brain science of vengeance. We examine issues identified with characterizing retribution first. I accept there is no reasonable norm to pass judgment on activity as inspiration for retribution. Vengeance is a clarification dependent on the conduct of the recognition trait of the entertainer. Next, we examine the physical, social and mental expenses and advantages related with reprisal. At that point I will check the spread of reprisal. In recognizing revenant want from vengeance, we question the idea of retribution as a programmed or widespread reaction to bad form. We underline the four factors that impact whether misrepresentation casualties pick counter. The tirelessness of outrage, the acknowledgment of cost of vengeance, the social and strict qualities ??of retribution, and the presence of an outer framework that can reestablish equity for casualties.
The awfulness of retribution (now and again called vengeance dramatization, vengeance show or bleeding misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the lethal aftereffect of vengeance and vengeance. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek authoritatively declared the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution dramatization”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and frequently killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort initially showed up in the early present day British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were likewise viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of popular retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).
In this investigation of vengeance and retribution of Elizabeth ‘s retribution, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the writer ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Their fundamental subject is like adhering to the competition, however the two shows present a differentiating picture … Hamlet – a misfortune of vengeance? Shakespeare’s misfortune A secretive arrangement of contemplations identified with retribution of Hamlet makes this article a fascinating encounter. Ruth Nevo clarifies the vulnerability involved by the hero’s most celebrated monolog in Acts 3 and 4 in vengeance. I can not peruse the talk