Various levels of social ecosystem

 

What are the various levels of your social ecosystem? In what ways have they changed in the past 5 or 10 years?
If something has changed within your social ecosystem, was it intentional? Or did your social ecosystem change you?
How have your relationships with specific aspects of your social ecosystem helped to shape your identity?
Do you think people act more based on who they are or based on their group’s behavior? Please provide a specific example to support your position.
How does the concept of identity and the group apply to any of the following programmatic course themes:
Self-care
Social justice
Emotional intelligence
Career connections
Ethics

 

Sample Solution

Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory argues that personal development is affected by environmental factors. The different levels of our social ecosystems are micro-,meso-, exo-, and macrosystems (Ettekal, 2017). In the last five years, different parts of my social ecosystems did change. My microsystem changed a bit. I started a new job and became a college student. As a result of that, my mesosytem changed a bit too. And with all these new changes, my exosystem changed as well. I am now prioritizing my job and school and the old things that I used to prioritize are not even in my mind.Of course some of the changes in my social ecosystem I planned out. Like getting a new job.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.