“War in Space – The Next Battlefield”

 

 

WATCH: “War in Space – The Next Battlefield”
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqtL1YIsuFM) and/or “Cyberwar!”
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaZw9mQu7xg
Begin your essay with your research question (EXAMPLES: Why did the film maker come to the conclusion they did [and not another conclusion]?, Why did
they not consider or emphasize another factor [x] that may have contributed to the process under study in the documentary? How did luck, planning, human
behavior or other factors shape given outcomes in the documentary and how might these be influenced by policy?)You are expected to analyze/criticize the
subject/substance of the documentary. DO NOT provide a summary. Tell me what they got wrong, could have done better, missed, failed to emphasize etc.
Alternately, you are encouraged to relate the subject of the documentary to other questions/issues in foreign policy. Focus on the politics/policy in each
documentary. Are there errors? In what ways is the documentary misleading? What have you gleaned from the readings, for example, that could allow you to
more critically assess the claims presented in the documentary? What policy implications suggested by the documentary? Do you accept these? Why or why
not? Do _not_ provide a critique of the film making
Make sure you define some concepts at the very beginning of your essays. This step not only clarifies the baseline of your argument but also demonstrates
that how you compare these concepts.
Use different paragraphs to show the flow of your essay. Though this is a short essay, using only one long paragraph to elaborate on your idea could weaken
the structure. Use different paragraphs when there’s a transition or additional points.

Sample Solution

orn a blank canvas and their lives are determined by varying experiences, positive interactions whilst acquiring different attributes and not due to DNA. She believed men and women were born equal and brains were malleable by culture, life experiences and desires, whereas Freud (1961) argued this and believed men and women’s brains were very different and the way they were formed was wholly down to DNA. Freud (1961) founded the study of psychoanalysis, he believed traumas and unresolved issues during childhood could be coaxed out by sensitive talk therapy. This can be seen in settings today by way of one:one counselling or through emotional literacy. Place2Be (1994) delivers school based therapeutic interventions. A large study was carried out on 47,000 children in primary schools, based on the findings of Place2Be, children’s social and emotional wellbeing had improved as perceived by their family members and teachers following interventions (White Et al., 2009). Supporting this Fox and Butler (2007) carried out a small-scale study on 219 pupils, attempting to discover whether counselling is successful in schools. The results suggested that the treatment delivered to the children, had less distress and fewer problems were observed. However, they recommended further research is required, to discover when and to who it was more of a success to. The evidence suggests that pupils receiving psychological therapies were a success however, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, 2010) expressed the opinion and recommended several forms of therapy as first-line interventions, not talk therapy or counselling in isolation. Another essential point regarding one:one counselling and emotional literacy is the relationship a child has with the facilitator. Mindmatters (n.d.) advocates how vital it is for children to have a trusting and caring relationship with the individual, as a result of this trust and understanding, will promote open communication. Similarly, Bowlby (1969) suggested that children come into this world with an innate response of survival; form attachments to survive. Consequently, if secure attachments are not formed this would lead to distress and negative experiences concluding that a trusting relationship is not formed between the pupil and the facilitator. Belsky and Fearon (2002) support Bowlby and state ‘poor attachment outcomes are associated with long-term adverse consequences in cognitive, adaptive, and behavioral domains’. Comparing Maslow (1968c), Bronfenbrenner (1979) Sameroff (2010) and Shonokoff an

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.