Welfare and American Foreign Policy

at
Categories
Tags

 

If more than 60 percent of the federal budget is “mandatory spending,” what is left to cut? What economic goals do categories of mandatory spending support? What programs should be abolished or cut? Should any programs be expanded? If so, identify which ones and explain why they should be expanded like agencies such as the Red Cross?
In recent years, the American armed forces have been called on to perform duties that are more humanitarian than militaristic, providing support after the Fukushima disaster, in addition to funds for drought victims in Ethiopia, COVID-19 vaccinations to countries who could not afford them, Ebola patients in West Africa, and earthquake victims in Nepal. Do we have an obligation to assist other countries experiencing a crisis, or should that be left to private relief agencies such as the Red Cross?
Please watch Breaking Point: California’s Homeless Crisis and comment. What went wrong? Will love to hear your comments. Steve
Regarding Welfare, do we give them a fish or teach them how to fish? Will love to hear your comments on Poverty and Social uplifting programs. Will love to hear your comments. Steve
Regarding American Foreign policy, how safe is the world today? Given all the recent Terror attacks are we making progress in defeating ISIS and other terrorist groups? Will love to hear your comments. Steve
1) The War on Terror has created a smaller faction’s terrorist groups than in the past. I wonder if we are making any inroads in the War on Terror or are, we creating more enemies against America? Will love to hear your comments. Steve
2) How safe is the world today? Given all the recent Terror attacks are we making progress in defeating ISIS and other terrorist groups? Will love to hear your comments. Steve

Sample Solution

The U.S. Department of State oversees ties between the United States and other nations, as well as with international organizations and their citizens. Diplomacy is the term used to describe how these connections are managed. Implementing the President’s foreign policy, State Department diplomats work to create a more free, wealthy, and secure global community. Because it represents the United States abroad and communicates American policies to foreign governments and international organizations through diplomatic missions, American embassies, consulates, and other diplomatic representations abroad, the State Department is a crucial branch of the U.S. government. contracts and treaties on topics ranging from trade to nuclear weapons are negotiated and signed;

p was chosen for office, his strategy toward Afghanistan moved from expanding the powers to diminishing military forces13, with a drawn out objective to leave Afghanistan altogether14. In December 2018, Trump requested the Pentagon to “pull out almost 50% of the 14,000 troops”15. While this “business as usual” circumstance would ultimately bring about a catalyst evacuation of U.S. compels, it forgets to think about the momentary effect of diminishing the tactical abilities in Afghanistan. A significant part driving the contention is disregarded with this procedure, the administration and legislative issues in Afghanistan. The broken political environment in Afghanistan has brought about mass movements of individuals out of the country, brutality against regular citizens, and debasement in the administering bodies.

With diminished U.S. drives, it is accepted that Afghanistan will “dive the nation further into chaos”16 and breed more enemy of American fear based oppressors. Furthermore, security has turned into a bigger worry as of late which would require more U.S. military work force to increment protections against Afghan neighbors Pakistan, Iran and Russia. However this approach saves a huge number of U.S. dollars, it doesn’t ensure collaboration from the Islamic State. The expulsion of the soldiers is a consequence of requests made by the Taliban to arrange a harmony manage the United States17 eliminating a portion of the influence American representatives have laid out throughout the long term. However the Taliban have demonstrated that the withdrawal of unfamiliar soldiers is a nonnegotiable interest, they actually liked to keep some unfamiliar presence due to the continuous danger of assaults from other Islamic groups18.

Authorities cautioned the President that eliminating 7,000 soldiers would bring about unfortunate results by giving the fanatic gatherings a space to design against the U.S. furthermore, its partners. Armed force General Austin Miller, the U.S. officer in Afghanistan, has communicated that the proceeded with mission in Afghanistan is pivotal to safeguarding U.S. security19. Moreover, eliminating half of the outfitted power from Afghanistan could be da

This question has been answered.

Get Answer