cpcpcpcp
  • Home
  • Services
    • Essay Services
      • Term Paper
      • Research Paper
      • Book Report/Review, Movie Review
      • Case Study
      • Coursework
      • Speech/Presentation
      • Lab Report
      • Article
      • Article Critique
      • Annotated Bibliography
      • Reaction Paper
    • Dissertation & Thesis Services
      • Dissertation
      • Thesis/Dissertation Proposal
      • Any dissertation chapter
      • Thesis
      • Research Proposal
      • Proofreading
      • Editing
    • Assignments
      • Online Assignments
      • Programming
      • Power Point Presentation
      • Statistics Project
      • Math/Physics/Economics/Statistics Problems
      • Multiple Choice Questions
      • Research Summary
      • Multimedia Project
      • Mind Mapping
      • Simulation
    • Admission Services
      • Admission Essay
      • Scholarship Essay
      • Personal Statement
      • Editing
    • Resume Services
      • Resume Writing
      • Resume Editing
      • CV Writing
      • CV Editing
      • Cover Letter
    • Editing Services
      • Editing
      • Proofreading
      • Formatting
  • Guarantees
  • Reviews
  • About Us
  • FAQs
  • Sample Papers
  • Contact Us
  • Sign Up
  • Sign In
  • USA: +1 917 810 5386
  • info@compliantpapers.com
Place Order Now

Wells Fargo and Moral Emotions

Published by admin at January 30, 2023
Categories
  • Ethics
Tags
  • Wells Fargo and Moral Emotions

 

 

On September 8, 2016, Wells Fargo, one of the nation’s oldest and largest banks, admitted in a settlement with regulators that it had created as many as two million accounts for customers without their permission. This was fraud, pure and simple. It seems to have been caused by a culture in the bank that made unreasonable demands upon employees. Wells Fargo agreed to pay $185 million in fines and penalties.
Employees had been urged to “cross-sell.” If a customer had one type of account with Wells Fargo, then top brass reasoned, they should have several. Employees were strongly incentivized, through both positive and negative means, to sell as many different types of accounts to customers as possible. “Eight is great” was a motto. But does the average person need eight financial products from a single bank? As things developed, when employees were unable to make such sales, they just made the accounts up and charged customers whether they had approved the accounts or not. The employees used customers’ personal identification numbers without their knowledge to enroll them in various products without their knowledge. Victims were frequently elderly or Spanish speakers.
Matthew Castro, whose father was born in Colombia, felt so bad about pushing sham accounts onto Latino customers than he tried to lessen his guilt by doing volunteer work. Other employees were quoted as saying “it’s beyond embarrassing to admit I am a current employee these days.”
Still other employees were moved to call company hotlines or otherwise blow the whistle, but they were simply ignored or oftentimes punished, frequently by being fired. One employee who sued to challenge retaliation against him was “uncomfortable” and “unsettled” by the practices he saw around him, which prompted him to speak out. “This is a fraud, I cannot be a part of that,” the whistleblower said.
Early prognostications were that CEO John Stumpf would not lose his job over the fiasco. However, as time went on and investigations continued, the forms and amount of wrongdoing seemed to grow and grow. Evidence surfaced that the bank improperly changed the terms of mortgage loans, signed customers up for unauthorized life insurance policies, overcharged small businesses for credit-card processing, and on and on.
In September of 2016, CEO Stumpf appeared before Congress and was savaged by Senators and Representatives of both parties, notwithstanding his agreement to forfeit $41 million in pay. The members of Congress denounced Wells Fargo’s actions as “theft,” “a criminal enterprise,” and an “outrage.” Stumpf simultaneously took “full responsibility,” yet blamed the fraud on ethical lapses of low-level bankers and tellers. He had, he said, led the company with courage. Nonetheless, by October of 2016 Stumpf had been forced into retirement and replaced by Tim Sloan.
Over the next several months, more and more allegations of wrongdoing arose. The bank had illegally repossessed cars from military veterans. It had modified mortgages without customer authorization.
It had charged 570,000 customers for auto insurance they did not need. It had ripped off small businesses by charging excessive credit card fees. The total number of fake accounts rose from two million to 3.5 million. The bank also wrongly fined 110,000 mortgage clients for missing a deadline even though the party at fault for the delay was Wells Fargo itself.
At its April 2017 annual shareholders meeting, the firm faced levels of dissent that a Georgetown business school professor, Sandeep Dahiya, called “highly unusual.”
By September 2017, Wells Fargo had paid $414 million in refunds and settlements and incurred hundreds of millions more in attorneys’ and other fees. This included $108 million paid to the Department of Veterans Affairs for having overcharged military veterans on mortgage refinancing.
In October 2017, new Wells Fargo CEO Tim Sloan was told by Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, that he should be fired: “You enabled this fake-account scandal. You got rich off it, and then you tried to cover it up.” Republicans were equally harsh. Senator John Kennedy Texas said: “I’m not against big. With all due respect, I’m against dumb.”
Sloan was still CEO when the company had its annual shareholders meeting in April 2018. Shareholder and protestors were both extremely angry with Wells Fargo. By then, the bank had paid an additional $1 billion fine for abuses in mortgage and auto lending. And, in an unprecedented move, the Federal Reserve Board had ordered the bank to cap its asset growth. Disgust with Wells Fargo’s practices caused the American Federation of Teachers, to cut ties with the bank. Some whistleblowers resisted early attempts at quiet settlements with the bank, holding out for a public admission of wrongdoing.
In May 2018, yet another shoe dropped. Wells Fargo’s share price dropped on news that the bank’s employees improperly altered documents of its corporate customers in an attempt to comply with regulatory directions related to money laundering rules.
Ultimately, Wells Fargo removed its cross-selling sales incentives. CEO Sloan, having been informed that lower level employees were suffering stress, panic attacks, and other symptoms apologized for the fact that management initially blamed them for the results of the toxic corporate culture, admitting that cultural weaknesses had caused a major morale problem.
1. What was the ethical dilemma and or ethic issue on the part of the bank’s employees? Explain.
2. Clearly inner-directed emotions such as guilt and embarrassment affected the actions of Wells Fargo employees. Were they always sufficient to overcome the employees’ utilitarian calculation: “I need this job”?
3. From the article “Integrity – Without it nothing works” explain how Wells Fargo (as a company) out-of-integrity behavior lost the trust in their customers.
4. Reflect on one (1) of the six most common rationalizations as explained in the video. Explain how you will preserve your moral intent by monitoring these rationalizations.

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

The ethical dilemma faced by Wells Fargo employees was one of whether or not to compromise their morals and values for the sake of keeping their jobs. The unethical behavior that was occurring within the company and being directed by management, such as opening fraudulent accounts in order to meet unrealistic quotas, put employees in a difficult situation. On one hand they had an intrinsic sense of morality guiding them towards doing what was right; on the other they had utilitarian concerns like needing to pay bills or support a family (Shultz et al., 2019). In addition, many felt pressure from higher ups who threatened termination if quotas were not met or certain sales goals were not achieved (Shultz et al., 2019). This created an environment where employees felt compelled to choose between either following orders with potentially illegal activities, or risk losing their job due to unmet expectations.
This dilemma also intersected with issues related to organizational culture and power dynamics at Wells Fargo. Employees described feeling trapped within a culture that “rewarded bad behavior” (Shultz et al., 2019), creating a system where unethical actions became commonplace and acceptable among higher-ups while all too often leading to negative consequences for those lower down in the chain of command. As such, this case serves as an example of how organizations can become complicit in unethical practices when moral principles are subordinated for the sake of profit, leaving employees feeling ethically torn between internal convictions and external pressures resulting from structural power differentials.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Testimonials

Awesome Writers

When I ordered my paper, even me i couldn’t understand some of the things the professor needed. My writer first tutored me to ensure we were on the same page, and proceeded to deliver a masterpiece. It was too good to be true. I still use this site hitherto.

McCarty
Wiley

What a Gem!

I was stuck with my MSN final project, and almost dropped the course, until a dear friend shared with me the link to this amazing website. The help i recieved, man – I still feel that I didn’t pay enough. I had to gift my writer with an iPhone. I was just too happy!

Lorie
Nurse

This is good

I used compliantpapers.com for my online test, and they scored 9/10, and I was so amazed. I didn’t know such service even existed. In my second paper, all was good apart from a few grammar errors which I handled myself. Otherwise, all good!

Ken
Kentucky

I recommend!

My paper was delivered in time, and for my first time, I was given a crazy welcome discount. From thence, I have been in love with these guys. Thank you for your help!

Audrey, Birmingham

Complaintpapers.com, simply the best

Awesome, awesome, awesome! Paper delivered on time, perfect quality, great customer service, and above all, they made our relationship so personal, especially Brian, the supervisor. So concerned and a great guy. I recommend to anyone looking for a peace of mind!

Shaunda Whitney, Australia

It couldn’t be better

I must confess that I have wandered off to many sites claiming to be legit, but I have been conned, or given sh**y quality papers. Once I found Complaintpapers.com, I have never looked elsewhere. The service is great, the writers are friendly, and revisions are unlimited. I can go all the way to my PhD, now that i have a worthy partner!

Bryant
Douche Wear

Thank you

Thank you for your support on this order. I will be loyal costumer to you

Marius Bildea B

Great service in the past. Future looks great.

Great service in the past. Future looks great.
Thank you for all essays received.

Digne

Reliable and trustworthy

Reliable and trustworthy. Perfect place to come to when you need help.

John Williams
Previous Slide
Next Slide

Writing Services We Offer

☑ Admission Services
☑ Dissertation Services
☑ Assignments
☑ Editing Services
☑ Online Media ProductsNEW!
☑ Thesis Services
☑ Essays Writing Services
☑ Resume Services

Place Order Now

We accept various forms of payment, such as:

Compliant Papers   

Services

  • Essay Writing Service
  • Coursework Writing Service
  • Report Writing
  • Dissertation Writing Service
  • Assignment Writing Service

Contact centre

Phone: USA: +1 917 810 5386, UK: +44 3286 1801
Skype: Superioressays
Whatsapp: +1 (917) 810-5386
Email us: info@compliantpapers.com / support@compliantpapers.com

© 2025 COMPLIANT PAPERS. All Rights Reserved.

      WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
      Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
      👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
      Hi, how can I help?