What incentives influence firms to use international strategies

 

respond to the following:

What incentives influence firms to use international strategies? What are the three basic benefits firms can gain by successfully implementing an international strategy? Why?
Determine why, given the advantages of international diversification, some firms choose not to expand internationally. Provide specific examples to support your response.
As firms attempt to internationalize, they may be tempted to locate their facilities where business regulation laws are lax. Discuss the advantages and potential risks of such an approach, using specific examples to support your response.

 

Sample Solution

The incentives that can influence firms to use an international strategy are: extend the life cycle of its products; gain access to needed and potentially scarce resources; and integrate operations on a global scale. A firm using a global strategy sacrifices responsiveness to local requirements within each of its markets in favor of emphasizing lower costs and better efficiency. This strategy is the complete opposite of a multi-domestic strategy. Firms derive three basic benefits by successfully using international strategies: increased market size; economies of scale and learning; and advantages of location. Increased market size is achieved by expansion beyond the firm`s home country.

k of burnout in teachers, as well as probable variances in these categories based on gender and teaching experience. Gender found no systematic correlations, whereas teaching experience had a curvilinear association with GPK, a negative linear relationship with self-efficacy, and no significant relationship with burnout, according to path analysis. GPK was found to be a negative predictor of teacher burnout both directly and indirectly through its positive relationship with teaching self-efficacy, according to mediation studies. In these analyses, only teaching specific self-efficacy, not general self-efficacy, served as a mediator; consequently, the discovered predictive effects are specific to instructors’ professional competence. (Lauermann et al., 2016).

The present research measures in a group of 374 Italian teachers—curricular and specialist support teachers—the relationship between self-perceived instructional competence, self-efficacy, and burnout. The current study, which took place between April and December 2020, is the second phase of a bigger study that took place between November 2018 and October 2019, and was reproduced during COVID-19. Participants completed an anamnestic questionnaire, the Assessment Teaching Scale, and the Maslach Burnout Inventory in both phases of research; an ad hoc questionnaire (to measure teaching practices) and the Teacher Sense of Self Efficacy Scale was added in the second phase. Personal accomplishment appears to be a predictor of emotional, socio-relational, and didactic competences before and during the pandemic, as confirmed by the data; elevated personal accomplishment appears to be a predictor of emotional, socio-relational, and didactic competences before and during the pandemic (Pellerone et al., 2021).

 

 

The goal of this study is to identify burnout levels in a sample of high school teachers that worked during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the goal of evaluating the relationship between burnout levels, trait emotional intelligence, and socioemotional competences (Autonomy, Regulation, Prosocial Behaviour and Empathy). A total of 430 high school teachers from various regions of Spain were included i

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.