What Is Ethical Research?

 

What Is Ethical Research?

Throughout the years, scientists have engaged in an array of ethically questionable research endeavors possessing dubious scientific value or validity. From the Nazi experimental trials to Stanley Milgram to the Tuskegee experiments, scientists have engaged in ethically unsound research in the name of progress or curiosity. The intelligentsia knew they could but failed to ask whether they should.

Identify the key tenets of ethical research used when evaluating criminal justice data and interpreting published research findings. Examine the principles that define ethical research in the field of criminal justice.

 

Sample Solution

A lot of people learn ethical norms at home, at school, in church, or in other social settings. Although most people acquire their sense of right and wrong during childhood, moral development occurs throughout life and human beings pass through different stages of growth as they mature. Ethical norms are so ubiquitous that one might be tempted to regard them as simple commonsense. On the other hand, if morality were nothing more than commonsense, then why are there so many ethical disputes and issues in our society? Alternative test methods are methods that replace, reduce, or refine animal use in research and testing One plausible explanation of these disagreements is that

uch as them being discharged to test their obdurate behavior towards the participants. The psychiatrists were not able to reliably distinguish normal people from those with an illness. A diagnostic method that makes any such errors cannot be considered valid or reliable. Collaboration was used greatly in this study as all eight participants worked together throughout the experiment. Without collaboration, this experiment would not have been completed accurately and properly as each and every step requires meticulous thinking. Also, the group was needed to gain proper admittance into the psychiatric ward for this rare situation. The production of knowledge in this study in the human sciences was a collaborative task and not solely the product of an individual.

The natural sciences is another area of knowledge in which production of knowledge can be seen as a collaborative task. The natural sciences is a branch of science that relates directly to the physical world including subjects such as physics, biology, chemistry, geology, and more. Research studies that show collaboration with production of knowledge are also conducted in this field. A biological study was conducted at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine about colorectal cancer. Dr. Subroto B. Chatterjee worked with colleagues to identify a protein, beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase-V, involved in the proliferation, rapid increase, of cells and development of new blood vessels could serve as biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer. The protein increased greatly in colorectal cancer tumor cells in comparison to normal human tissue. For further collaboration, he assigned groups of researchers to the same area of study to have multiple trials and perspectives on results. After observation of growth and an increase in activity, Dr. Chatterjee and other scientists began testing by inhibiting the protein and finding that the byproducts halted colorectal cancer cell proliferation. To conduct further research, Chatterjee collaborated with students and scientists from Johns Hopkins; they found elevated gene expressions in relation to colorectal cancer. They also used a previous study from 2013 in order to supplement their current research. This previous study was from Chatterjee’s previous group to show daily treatment with an inhibitor showing a reduction in the protein beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase-V. With this research, there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate blockage of the cycle of cell proliferation. Further collaboration between Dr. Chatterjee, Dr. Hou, Dr. Bandaru, Dr. Mannan and Dr. Sharma from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Dr. Pezhouh from Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine was shown in the publication of the study. Without the collaboration of the scientists, this study would not have been completed as there are many steps and complications throughout the experiment. There was also the collaboration of information from multiple groups in order to reach a conclusion. The publication had many authors as well. Because so many people worked together in order to produce this knowledge, it can be said that knowledge production

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.