What separates humans from animals?

 

“What separates humans from animals is that animals act purely on instinct whereas humans have a complex interior life”. Critically analyse this statement using theoretical ideas from across the module

 

 

Sample Solution

This statement implies that the interior life of human beings is more complex and developed than that of animals. This idea can be explored through the works of Jean-Paul Sartre, who proposed a concept of consciousness which he termed as “human condition” (Sartre, 1943). According to Sartre, humans possess an unparalleled ability to choose between different courses of action and contemplate their consequences. He further argued that this capacity for self-determination sets humans apart from other creatures in the natural world because it allows us to exercise our own free will and make meaningful decisions without relying on instinct alone.

In addition to this, philosopher Hannah Arendt also discussed how human reasoning is distinct from animal instinct (Arendt, 1958). She argued that while animals act mainly out of necessity or desire they do so without any thought or forethought whereas humans are able to reflect upon events before making moral choices based upon what would benefit themselves or society in general. This suggests that not only do we have more complex inner lives but also higher level cognitive abilities such as abstract thinking which allow us to go beyond basic instincts when making decisions.

Furthermore , psychoanalyst Erik Erikson provided evidence for the complexity of human emotion within his eight stages theory . By identifying eight different stages in life , Erikson observed how people progress towards adulthood with each successive stage bringing about new challenges and opportunities for growth (Erikson 2009 ). This demonstrates how human emotions are far more intricate than those found in animals as we constantly face new psychological struggles at various points in our development .

Therefore it can be seen that there are a number of theoretical ideas from across the module which lend support to this statement . Not only do humans possess higher levels mental capabilities such as abstract thinking but they also experience much more complex emotional states due to their capacity for self – determination and reflective thought processes.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.