Why Americans struggle to be happy

 

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/why_americans_struggle_to_be_happy

*Watch “The Social Dilemma” and take a few notes in your journal – make observations about things you strongly agree with, things you are unsure of, and/or things you disagree with. (5-6 bullet points is enough, but feel free to write as many as would like)

*Write a reflection (min 250 words) in your journal on your experiences with social media. Some questions to consider might be:

Has Social Media influenced your self identity and esteem? In what ways? How have you seen it impact your peers? Would you consider yourself addicted to checking your phone and your media accounts? What would life look and feel like if you gave them up completely? What is your “philosophy” of using social media? What is the “good life” that is experienced and/or promised through social media? Feel free to use insights or reflections from the Social Dilemma or other sources in your reflection.

 

Sample Solution

Why Americans struggle to be happy

The creation of social media sites and applications has changed the ways in which people interact, connect, and share with one another. As the number of social media sites and apps increases, children and adolescents increase their usage (Anderson, 2018). I believe social media has impacted people`s self-esteem in a negative way. Social media has been linked to higher levels of loneliness, envy, anxiety, depression, narcissism and decreased social skills. Being a little obsessed with following dates on social media we really do lack the skills to communicate effectively in person. This lack of security and communication skills most definitely increases anxiety and depression. I see so much anxiety related to dating and how to navigate texting and communication.

The widespread use of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAAT) has decreased the progression to AIDS and death (Palella et al., 1998; Porter et al., 2003). In developed nations, the utilization of HAART has rolled out it conceivable to improvement the regular history of HIV contamination into an unending illness that now requires long-term antiretroviral treatment (Mahungu et al., 2009b). Despite the advantages of HAART, wide intraand inter-subject variability has been watched both in light of treatment and in the adverse reaction of certain antiretroviral drugs. In point of fact, reaction to HAART is profoundly complex and frequently restricted by the advancement of short or long term toxicities and the rise of antiretroviral drug resistance. This variability can be clarified by Pharmacokinetics (Factors that manage the availability of the drugs), pharmacodynamics (the effect of drug on the host) and viral pharmacodynamics (the activity of the virus itself).

The efficacy of therapy is influenced by viral sensitivity to a medication. Mutagenesis is a consistent procedure in the viral genome; thusly, mutations happen at every replication cycle, in this manner empowering the infection (virus) to easily adapt. Besides, transmitted HIV drug resistance is a developing phenomenon with vital clinical implications that can bargain initial antiretroviral treatment. Additionally, to viral mutations, different factors may likewise add to treatment failure. Poor adherence is prone to be the most vital reason for treatment failure, however inter-subject variability in pharmacokinetics also assumes to be a vital part. Actually, interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral medications can assume a part in treatment failure or toxicity, either straightforwardly, on the grounds that subtherapeutic drug levels can expand the risk of a poor virologic reaction, or in an indirect way, when high (toxic) drug levels produce critical intolerability, prompting poor adherence (Cressey and Lallemant, 2007). Variability between patients in connection to the distribution and bioavailability of antiretroviral drug regimens is most likely determined by genetic and environmental factors, for example, drug-food interactions, drug-drug interactions, sex, and body weight. Specifically, genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters add to wide variability in drug pharmacokinetics, response to treatment, and lethality (toxicity).

This review provides an overview of pharmacogenetics generally and of current knowledge on pharmacogenetic factors that are connected with both the host and the target (i.e., the infection), which may represent intra-and interindividual variability in responsiveness to antiretroviral treatment. Specifically, this article looks to provide a sup

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.