Identify multidimensional nursing care strategies for clients with reproductive system disorders.
Scenario
You work in a gynecological office, and your office has been asked to participate in a women’s health fair. The focus of the fair is health promotion. Preventative screening for female reproductive disorders is vital to identify and treat rapidly to produce the best patient outcomes. Preventative screening includes mammogram and Pap smear and should be performed based on recommended age and associated risk factors. To promote preventative screening, your office will be creating brochures to distribute at the health fair.
Instructions
Design a women’s health brochure by choosing one of the female reproductive disorders covered in this module. In the brochure, include the following:
Overview of the disease including disease process, signs and symptoms, and risk factors
Preventative screening
Diagnostics tests
Treatment
Multidimensional nursing care interventions
Signs and symptoms include pelvic pain which may worsen during menstruation, painful intercourse, chronic fatigue or bloating (ACOG, 2019). Risk factors for developing endometriosis include early onset puberty, having family members who also have had it and never having been pregnant as well as certain lifestyle factors such as smoking or using estrogen-containing contraceptives (Dong et al., 2014).
Preventative screening for endometriosis includes keeping track of menstrual cycles and reporting any abnormal symptoms such as severe cramps or heavy bleeding. Additionally regular checkups with a gynecologist can help detect potential symptoms earlier and identify any risk factors (ACOG, 2019). Furthermore diagnostic tests such as ultrasounds, CT scans or MRIs can be used to confirm diagnosis. The ACOG recommends exploring conservative treatments before jumping into more invasive tests such as laparoscopy unless there is a suspicion that cancer might be present (2019) .
In conclusion ,endometriosis is a common reproductive disorder affecting many women worldwide. Although there isn’t one specific cause it can be detected earlier through preventive measures like tracking menstrual cycles alongside professional consultation when dealing with suspicious signs or symptoms. Diagnostic tests including ultrasounds , CT scans ,MRIs etc should then be done depending upon severity followed by treatment options.
detainees of war, they should do it for the right goal and for a noble motivation, relative to the damage done to them. This is upheld by Vittola: ‘not generally legitimate to execute all warriors… we should consider… size of the injury incurred by the foe.’ This is additionally upheld by Frowe approach, which is much more upright than Vittola’s view yet infers similar plans: ‘can’t be rebuffed just for battling.’ This implies one can’t just rebuff another in light of the fact that they have been a soldier. They should be treated as compassionately as could be expected. Nonetheless, the circumstance is heightened on the off chance that killing them can prompt harmony and security, inside the interests, everything being equal. Generally, jus in bello proposes in wars, mischief must be utilized against soldiers, never against the blameless. However, eventually, the point is to lay out harmony and security inside the district. As Vittola’s decision: ‘the quest for equity for which he battles and the protection of his country’ is the thing countries ought to be battling for in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332). Subsequently, albeit the present world has created, we can see not entirely different from the pioneer accounts on fighting and the traditionists, giving one more part of the hypothesis of the simply war. By and by, we can in any case presume that there can’t be one conclusive hypothesis of the simply war hypothesis in light of its normativity.
Jus post bellum
At last, jus post bellum recommends that the moves we ought to make after a conflict (Frowe (2010), Page 208). Right off the bat, Vittola contends after a conflict, it is the obligation of the pioneer to judge how to manage the foe (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Once more, proportionality is underscored. For instance, the Versailles deal forced after WWI is tentatively excessively unforgiving, as it was not all Germany’s problem for the conflict. This is upheld by Frowe, who communicates two perspectives in jus post bellum: Moderation and Maximalism, which are very varying perspectives. Minimalists recommend a more merciful methodology while maximalist, supporting the above model, gives a crueler methodology, rebuffing the foe both financially and strategically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last occasion, nonetheless, the point of war is to lay out harmony security, so whatever should be done can be ethically legitimate, assuming it observes the guidelines of jus promotion bellum. All in all, simply war hypothesis is truly contestable and can contend in various ways. Notwithstanding, the foundation of an equitable harmony is vital, making all war type circumstance to have various approaches to drawing closer (Frowe (2010), Page 227). By and by, the simply war hypothesis contains jus promotion bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum, and it very well may be either ethically disputable or legitimate contingent upon the proportionality of the situation. Subsequently, there can’t be one conclusive hypothesis of the simply war yet just a hypothetical manual for show how wars ought to be battled, showing normativity in its record, which responds to the inquiry to what a conflict hypothesis is.