World literature; The apology

 

 

1. In the beginning of the dialog (section 17), how does Socrates distinguish his manner of speech from that of
his accusers? How does he speak differently from them? How might this way of speaking serve to strengthen,
rhetorically, Socrates speech in defense of himself?
2.Who were the “sophists”? How does Socrates distinguish himself from them in section 19d? Why would it be
significant that he doesn’t accept money for his education or teaching, while the sophists (who are some of the
accusers in the audience) do?

Sample Solution

World literature; the apology

Socrates opens his case with an appeal to the jury to listen to him and to pardon him if he slips into his usual conversational style. His accusers have already spoken against him in the flowery manner common in courts of law, and have warned the jury not to be deceived by Socrates, a skillful speaker. Socrates immediately addresses himself to that issue, claiming that while his accusers` speeches contained great refinement and skill, he lacks the ability to speak so well. However, he remarks, he will speak the truth whereas his opponents uttered only falsehood. Socrates further contrasts himself with his accusers, suggesting that while their rhetorical flourishes were the result of prepared speech, his speech will be fully improvised, issuing thoughts as they come to him. We shouldn’t take Socrates` words at face value. In claiming that he is not a clever speaker, he is in fact showing himself to be clever indeed.

tudents has included their overall discomfort , different orientations towards their professors, having different learning styles and holding hostility between age groups.
Personal life barriers, financial responsibilities and different learning styles are known as the wide variety of characteristics in adult learners, compared to a traditional student.
However, these barriers can be overcome by the aid of the educational institution and the course tutors, as it’s their responsibility to do so by any means. Thus, resulting in the learner feeling comfortable and welcomed when they return to the classroom.
The disadvantage of this journal article is the date it was published. Consequently, 2005 is outdated in terms with the adaptation movements of modern technologies, bearing witness to limited evidence of change.

From reviewing these 3 literature pieces, the similarities are evident in that the main concern is not established.
Discussion and the development of research questions were created following these to make the main concern confirmedly known. From this discovery, the researchers created an open titled question to ask individuals who they knew were thinking about going back into studying higher education.

Method
Design research
Devised by part of a group created by four researchers, 5 questions were prepared to find out what the main concern was to adult learners who were returning to higher education. All questions were operationalised in the making of the interviews being conducted in the same manner. Moreov

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.